Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Apr 17;59(6):2509–2515. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00905

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Comparison of the docking time of MedusaDock 1.0 and MedusaDock 2.0. (B) Comparison of the RMSD between predicted ligand poses and native ligand poses of MedusaDock 1.0 and MedusaDock 2.0. No constraints are imposed in the comparison. (C) The comparison of the docking times of Autodock23, RosettaLigand5, and MedusaDock 2.0. The suffix /0 refers to docking no constraints. The suffix /2 refers to docking with 2 constraints. (D) The comparison of the RMSDs of Autodock23, RosettaLigand5, and MedusaDock 2.0.