Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;9:9337. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45843-3

Table 3.

Results of logistic and linear regressions of the HOPE effect in the matched cohort.

Effect* 95% CI p
Stage 2–3 acute kidney injury 0.29 0.08–0.86 0.024
Severe post-reperfusion syndrome 0.24 0.02–1.11 0.069
Early allograft dysfunction 0.93 0.33–2.50 0.89
ALT peak (IU/L) −25 −326–+276 0.87
AST peak (IU/L) −73 −699–554 0.82
Lactate at the end of LT 0.05 −0.68–+0.68 0.89
Grade ≥3 complications 0.91 0.16–5.06 0.87
Acute rejection 2.39 1.62–3.53 0.20
Hospital stay (days) −2.3 −9.1–+4.4 0.49
ITU stay (days) 0.13 −1.5–+1.8 0.87
Biliary complications 1.26 0.32–4.95 0.70
Anastomotic
   Overall 1.24 0.28–5.49 0.76
   Symptomatic 1.52 0.51–4.57 0.56
Post-transplant cholangiopathy
   Overall 0.89 0.15–5.19 0.90
   Symptomatic 0.34 0.002–4.41 0.45

*For dichotomous outcomes (acute kidney injury, post-reperfusion syndrome, early allograft dysfunction and biliary complications) effect represents the odds ratio of the outcome in patients treated with HOPE; for continuous outcomes (ALT and AST peak) effect represents the mean variation of the outcome in treated patients. Abbreviations: HOPE, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion; CI, confidence interval; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase.