Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;21(5):81. doi: 10.1208/s12248-019-0351-9

Table III.

Model Parameter Estimates for the Sildenafil “Reference Model” Versus the Sildenafil “Extrapolation Model” and the Bootstrap Results for both Models Based on n = 250 Resampling

Parameter Reference model Extrapolation model
Model estimate (RSE) Bootstrap (90 CI) Model estimate (RSE) Bootstrap (90 CI)

Sildenafil clearance

CLi = CL70 kg × (WTi/70)k1

(CL/F)70 kg (L/h) 113 (13%) 112 (84.6–149) 100 fix 100 fix
k1 1.08 (11%) 1.05 (0.82–1.30) 0.874 fix 0.874 fix

Volume of distribution

Vi = V28 kg × (WTi/28)k2

(V/F)28 kg (L) 540 (33%) 561 (311–1424) 590 (29%) 574 (389–1134)
k2 3.18 (10%) 3.17 (2.41–4.27) 3.18 (10%) 3.16 (2.49–4.01)
Absorption rate constant ka (h−1) 1 fix 1 fix 1 fix 1 fix
IIV clearance ω2 CL/F 0.493 (14%) 0.487 (0.363–0.631) 0.510 (13%) 0.512 (0.397–0.650)
Proportional error σ 2 0.627 (7%) 0.616 (0.538–0.703) 0.651 (8%) 0.646 (0.564–0.738)

RSE is the relative standard error, and 90 CI is the 90% confidence interval representing the 5th and 95th percentiles. Interindividual and residual variability values are shown as variance estimates

Parameters are apparent parameters, as only oral data was included