Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 27;10:2819. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10800-1

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

vHipp-NAc and vHipp-mPFC pathways differentially affect distinct types of cognitive flexibility. MAM treatment causes a deficit in both reversal learning and in extradimensional set-shifting. Inhibition of the vHipp-NAc pathway completely abolishes the MAM-induced deficit in reversal learning (a). Asterisk is significantly different than saline/GFP. Plus is significantly different than MAM/GFP. However, vHipp-NAc inhibition had no effect on extradimensional set-shifting (c). Asterisk is significant main effect of MAM. n = 6–7 rats per group. Conversely, inhibition of the vHipp-mPFC pathway had no effect on reversal learning performance (b) Asterisk is significant main effect of MAM. n = 6–9 rats per group. However, vHipp-mPFC inhibition did attenuate the MAM-induced deficit in extradimensional set-shifting (d). Aserisk is significantly different than saline/GFP; plus is significantly different than MAM/GFP. n = 6–7 rats per group. All stages of the AST are shown in e, (f). All data were analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA and Holm–Sidak tests. Data are shown as mean ± SEM