Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 26;16(155):20190083. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0083

Table 4.

Comparisons of actual and predicted FT4 values of patients 2, 16, 23 using FT4 formulae shown in table 3 derived with at most data from the first five visits.

patient S/N visits ATD dosage (mg) review interval (day) actual FT4 (pmol l−1) predicted FT4 (pmol l−1)
2 1st 0 0 75
2 2nd 30 77 13 11.9
2 3rd 15 28 7 13.9
2 4th 10 168 16 14.8
2 5th 5 168 15 16.0
2 6th 5 91 15 16.0
2 7th 0 98 25 17.3
2 8th 5 84 13 16.0
2 9th 5 203 13 16.0
16 1st 0 0 14
16 2nd 15 90 13 11.6
16 3rd 17.5 78 10 11.3
23 1st 0 0 40
23 2nd 15 35 16 12.1
23 3rd 15 84 10 12.1
23 4th 7.5 84 13 14.2