Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;12(6):1096–1113. doi: 10.1111/eva.12783

Table 4.

The number of samples analysed (No), observed (H O) and expected heterozygosity (H E) values with standard error (SE), per cent polymorphic loci (P%), identity by descent (IBD) per cattle group, effective population size with 95% confidence interval (N E), and number of private alleles (P A)

Cattle breed/lineage No H O (SE) H E (SE) P% IBD mean (range) N E P A
Jutland Kortegaard‐lineage 20 0.2618 (0.00026) 0.2474 (0.00023) 73.1 0.296 (0–0.642) 9.1 (9.1–9.2) 2
Jutland Oregaard‐lineage 20 0.2776 (0.00026) 0.2647 (0.00023) 75.8 0.261 (0–0.677) 10.0 (10.0–10.0) 32
Jutland Vesterbølle‐lineage 20 0.2833 (0.00026) 0.2752 (0.00022) 78.8 0.218 (0–0.620) 21.6 (21.5–21.7) 5
Jutland Westergaard‐lineage 16 0.2532 (0.00028) 0.2267 (0.00023) 67.8 0.384 (0.187–0.724) 4.0 (4.0–4.1) 9
Old bulls pre‐1980 15 0.3034 (0.00026) 0.2860 (0.00022) 81.3 0.216 (0–0.591) 24.8 (24.7–24.9) 7
Old bulls post‐1980a 14 0.2800 (0.00024) 0.2857 (0.00022) 80.7 0.134 (0–0.685) 11.8 (11.7–11.8)
SDM‐1965 20 0.2842 (0.00024) 0.2838 (0.00022) 81.2 0.160 (0–0.592) 18.0 (17.9–18.0) 9
Western Norwegian Fjord cattle 21 0.3035 (0.00024) 0.2983 (0.00021) 84.1 0.151 (0–0.566) 35.0 (34.9–35.1) 216
Western Norwegian Red‐polled cattle 19 0.2980 (0.00025) 0.2849 (0.00022) 80.6 0.216 (0–0.609) 18.0 (18.0–18.1) 221
Faroe cattle 8 0.2997 (0.00029) 0.2707 (0.00023) 75.0 0.293 (0.196–0.646) 12.2 (12.2–12.3) 55
Holstein 9 0.3053 (0.00028) 0.2836 (0.00022) 77.0 0.241 (0.209–0.341) 92.0 (89.6–94.4) 45
Jersey 9 0.2705 (0.00029) 0.2483 (0.00023) 69.9 0.327 (0.272–0.506) 28.9 (28.6–29.2) 112

NE and PA were calculated with LD‐pruned data. Further IBD details are provided in Supporting Information Table S3 and Supporting Information Figure S3.

a

Including only cryopreserved semen samples of n = 14 Danish Jutland cattle recognized in the studbook.