Table 3.
Sub-hazard ratios for incident dementia in people with sub-syndromal depression at baseline
| Unadjusted sHR (95% CI)a | Model 2 sHR (95% CI)a | Model 3 sHR (95% CI)a | ||||
| Cuba | 0.98 (0.66–1.45) | 0.89 (0.59–1.33) | 0.88 (0.59–1.32) | |||
| Dominican Republic | 1.21 (0.85–1.72) | 1.11 (0.78–1.57) | 1.10 (0.77–1.56) | |||
| Peru | 0.99 (0.57–1.71) | 0.82 (0.46–1.46) | 0.82 (0.47–1.46) | |||
| Venezuela | 2.10 (1.50–2.95) | 2.22 (1.56–3.14) | 2.13 (1.50–3.03) | |||
| Mexico | 1.41 (0.96–2.05) | 1.38 (0.94–2.01) | 1.37 (0.93–2.02) | |||
| Puerto Rico | 1.43 (0.96–2.14) | 1.47 (0.97–2.22) | 1.38 (0.90–2.12) | |||
| I2 | I2 | I2 | ||||
| Pooled | 1.37 (1.17–1.60) | 53.7% | 1.32 (1.12–1.55) | 68.7% | 1.28 (1.09–1.51) | 66.0% |
Competing risk models presented using sub-hazard ratios (sHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). I2, Higgins I2.; Model 1: unadjusted, Model 2: adjusted for age, gender, and education level, and Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, education level, stroke, and diabetes.; apeople with no depression were used as the reference group.