Table 3.
Neurophysiological assessments | Patients with schizophrenia Mean ± SD | Healthy control subjects Mean ± SD | Non-psychotic siblings Mean ± SD |
---|---|---|---|
MVC | |||
Right hand, N | 384 ± 113 | 411 ± 124 | 326 ± 73 |
Left hand, N | 346 ± 104 | 398 ± 112 | 334 ± 84 |
TMS | |||
Resting motor threshold, % stimulator | 54 ± 11 | 52 ± 8 | 50 ± 9 |
Unconditioned MEP amplitude, mV | 1.80 ± 1.06 | 1.70 ± 0.98 | 1.98 ± 1.44 |
Conditioned MEP amplitude, mV | 0.85 ± 0.53 | 0.53 ± 0.37* | 0.53 ± 0.35* |
SICI, % reduction | 53 ± 17 | 68 ± 17* | 71 ± 19** |
Control elements | |||
REST EMG activity (mV) | 0.004 ± 0.003 | 0.003 ± 0.002 | 0.004 ± 0.002 |
HOLD EMG activity (mV) | 0.018 ± 0.007 | 0.017 ± 0.010 | 0.016 ± 0.008 |
MVC for each hand was tested using force dynamometer. Resting motor threshold, MEPs for unconditioned and conditioned stimulus and SICI were obtained at baseline. Control elements were obtained 1500 ms prior to the stimulation during the rest and hold phases of the visuomotor tracking task. This to show that any changes in MEP amplitude cannot be attributed to group differences in EMG background activity. Group differences (t-tests) are displayed as follow: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.