Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;27(8):2911–2920. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4591-5

Table 2.

Results of implementation by healthcare professionals

Total group (N = 61) Implementers (N = 44) Non-implementers (N = 17)
N (%) N (%) N (%)
Professiona
 - Medical specialist 1 (1.6%) 1 (2.3%) 0
 - Nurse 37 (60.7%) 27 (61.4%) 10 (58.8%)
 - Nurse specialist 16 (26.2%) 13 (29.5%) 3 (17.6%)
 - Support staffb 7 (11.5%) 3 (6.8%) 4 (23.5%)
Number of new patients each yeara
 - 1–5 0 0 0
 - 6–10 0 0 0
 - 11–50 10 (16.4%) 6 (13.6%) 4 (23.5%)
 - More than 50 50 (82.0%) 38 (86.4%) 12 (70.6%)
 - None 1 (1.6%) 0 1 (5.9%)
Number of patients that Oncokompas was offered to.
 - 1–5 19 19 (43.2%) NA
 - 6–10 10 10 (22.7%) NA
 - 11–50 11 11 (25.0%) NA
 - More than 50 4 4 (9.1%) NA
 - None 17 0 NA
Main reasons for (occasionally) not offering Oncokompas (multiple answers allowed)
 - No time to offer Oncokompas 6 (9.8%) 2 (4.5%) 4 (23.5%)
 - Was done by somebody else (e.g., nurse or MD) 9 (14.8%) 7 (15.9%) 2 (11.8%)
 - Forgot to register the patient 24 (39.3%) 20 (45.5%) 4 (23.5%)
 - I do not endorse the use of Oncokompas 1 (1.6%) 0 1 (5.9%)
 - I do not endorse the content of Oncokompas 4 (6.6%) 3 (6.8%) 1 (5.9%)
Custom reasons for not offering Oncokompas
 - Mainly patients in palliative care 5 (8.2%) 1 (2.3%) 4 (23.6%)
 - Patients do not have access to the internet 4 (6.6%) 4 (9.1%) 0
 - Too difficult (for patient) 3 (4.9%) 2 (4.5%) 1 (5.9%)
 - Unfamiliarity with Oncokompas 4 (6.6%) 2 (4.5%) 2 (11.8%)
Number of patients with whom Oncokompas was discussed during follow-up consult
 - 1–5 21 19 (43.2%) NA
 - 6–10 4 4 (9.1%) NA
 - 11–50 3 3 (6.8%) NA
 - None 33 18 (40.9%) NA
Number of patients that brought a print or digital copy of their Oncokompas dossier
 - 1–5 3 3 (6.8%) NA
 - None 58 41 (93.2%) NA

NA: not applicable

aNo significant differences were found between groups

bMedical secretary, physician assistant