Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 6;10(2):81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.06.003

Table 5.

Effect of EEIP on serum enzymes and lipid proteins.

Treatment groups Cholesterol (mg/dl) TGL (mg/dl) AST (U/L) ALT (U/L) ALP (U/L)
G1 108.85 ± 3.05 136.85 ± 2.55 36.40 ± 1.65 31.28 ± 1.45 132.28 ± 2.08
G2 146.95 ± 4.34a 220.28 ± 4.40a 78.6 ± 2.94a 62.32 ± 2.60a 265.30 ± 4.35a
G3 126.30 ± 3.84b 169.15 ± 2.65b 44.40 ± 1.72b 34.52 ± 1.70b 154.45 ± 2.40b
G4 117.26 ± 3.42b 160.08 ± 2.55b 42.44 ± 2.30b 35.28 ± 1.55b 162.45 ± 2.22b
G5 115.18 ± 3.38b 156.25 ± 2.50b 41.60 ± 2.20b 34.90 ± 1.42b 160.48 ± 2.18b
G6 113.36 ± 3.26b 153.30 ± 2.46b 40.90 ± 2.16b 34.80 ± 1.38b 158.45 ± 2.15b

G1 – Normal control, G2 – Cancer control, G3 – Positive control, G4–G6 – Treatment control EEIP 100, 200, 400 mg/kg respectively, Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TGL), Aspartate amino Transferase (AST), Alanine amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), U/L – units per liter.

All values are expressed as mean ± SD for 6 animals in each group.

One-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test.

a

Values are significantly different from normal control (G1) at p < 0.01.

b

Values are significantly different from cancer control (G2) at p < 0.01.