Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):637–652. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00712-4

Table 2.

Path Analyses Model Fit Comparisons and the Relationship Between Executive Function to Willingness to Wait and Willingness to Work for Reward by Reward Conditions

Willingness to Wait SEM Model Comparison χ2 Difference χ2 df Difference p-value

Model A Model B 10.31 5 .07
Model A Model C 5.32 1 .02*
Model C Model D 23.16 10 .01*
Neutral N-Back Accuracy Negative N-Back Accuracy

Delay Condition β p-value β p-value

2 weeks −0.11 .25 0.28 .003**
1 month −0.16 .084 0.35 >.001**
6 months −0.27 .004* 0.45 >.001**
1 year −0.18 .058 0.27 .006**
3 years −0.18 .068 0.27 .005**
10 years −0.21 .032* 0.18 .064
Willingness to Work
SEM Model Comparison
χ2 Difference χ2 df Difference p-value

Model A Model B 21.03 2 <.0001**
Model A Model C 0.33 1 .57
Model B Model D 1.13 3 .77
N-Back Accuracy (General)
Probability Condition β p-value

12% −0.07 .33
50% 0.40 >.001
88% 0.29 .003
**

Significant p-values .005-.001,

*

Significant p-values .01-.006;

DDT = Delay Discounting Task, EEfRT = Effort Expenditure for Reward Task