Table 2.
Path Analyses Model Fit Comparisons and the Relationship Between Executive Function to Willingness to Wait and Willingness to Work for Reward by Reward Conditions
Willingness to Wait SEM Model Comparison | χ2 Difference | χ2 df Difference | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Model A | Model B | 10.31 | 5 | .07 |
Model A | Model C | 5.32 | 1 | .02* |
Model C | Model D | 23.16 | 10 | .01* |
Neutral N-Back Accuracy | Negative N-Back Accuracy | |||
Delay Condition | β | p-value | β | p-value |
2 weeks | −0.11 | .25 | 0.28 | .003** |
1 month | −0.16 | .084 | 0.35 | >.001** |
6 months | −0.27 | .004* | 0.45 | >.001** |
1 year | −0.18 | .058 | 0.27 | .006** |
3 years | −0.18 | .068 | 0.27 | .005** |
10 years | −0.21 | .032* | 0.18 | .064 |
Willingness to Work SEM Model Comparison |
χ2 Difference | χ2 df Difference | p-value | |
Model A | Model B | 21.03 | 2 | <.0001** |
Model A | Model C | 0.33 | 1 | .57 |
Model B | Model D | 1.13 | 3 | .77 |
N-Back Accuracy (General) | ||||
Probability Condition | β | p-value | ||
12% | −0.07 | .33 | ||
50% | 0.40 | >.001 | ||
88% | 0.29 | .003 |
Significant p-values .005-.001,
Significant p-values .01-.006;
DDT = Delay Discounting Task, EEfRT = Effort Expenditure for Reward Task