Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):341–352. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180254

Table 3.

Intent to Treat and Connection to Health Per Protocol Comparisons of Impact on Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over Time

Outcome is HbA1c over time Intent To Treat,
N=1022
Connection to Health Per
Protocol, N=458
Variable Adjusted models
Coef (SE)
p-value Adjusted models
Coef (SE)
p-value
Intercept 7.5385 (.1941) <.0001 6.6848 (.2368) <.0001
Age group
 17 to 49
 50 to 64
 65 or greater

ref
.8017 (.1368)
−1.2746 (.1449)

---
<.0001
<.0001

Ref
.8571 (.1956)
−1.057 (.2199)

---
<.0001
<.0001
Gender - Female .0881 (.1034) .3942 .2259 (.1572) .1509
BMI (at baseline, centered) −.0232 (.0070) .0010 −0.0436 (.0105) <.0001
Pulmonary −.4775 (.2289) .0371
Diabetic retinopathy .3368 (.1595) .0348
Renal .4531 (.2587) .0801
Oral diabetic medications .7150 (.1287) <.0001 0.6452 (.1817) .0004
Insulin 1.7418 (.1117) <.0001 1.7147 (.1663) <.0001
Intervention vs SMS-ED (at baseline)
 CTH vs SMS-ED
 CTH + PF vs SMS-ED

−.0987 (.1551)
.0160 (.1524)

.5245
.9164

−0.049 (.3530)
0.6519 (.2300)

.8891
.0047
HbA1c change per 12 months (slope)

SMS-ED
CTH
CTH + PF


.1638 (.0853)
.3022 (.0756)
.1441 (.0721)
Compared
to SMS-ED
---
.2243
.8601


0.1546 (.0920)
0.0671 (.2255)
−0.1640 (.1269)
Compared
to SMS-ED
---
.7193
.0422
1

SMS-ED = Self-Management Support Education, CTH = Connection to Health, CTH+PF = Connection to Health with Practice Facilitation

2

Overall p-value for group x time: .2724. The overall group x time effect is used to determine whether there are differences in slopes between the three study arms. The coefficients in the table show the actual slopes (SE) for each study arm, along with the p-value for the differences for CTH vs SMS-ED, and CTH+PF vs SMS-ED.