Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan 9;100(7):1251–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.12.024

Table 2.

Principal component loadings from full sample (n=67)

Test/Subtest Component 1 Component 2
Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test
    Personal Facts .89 .05
    Symbol Cancellation .10 .53
    Confrontation Naming .89 .18
    Story Retelling .83 .14
    Symbol Trails .26 .79
    Generative Naming .79 .28
    Design Memory .26 .62
    Mazes −.09 .82
    Design Generation .08 .65
Western Aphasia Battery-Revised
    Spontaneous Speech .87 .21
    Auditory Verbal Comprehension .82 .21
    Repetition .88 .12
    Naming and Word Finding .96 .17
    Reading .89 .22
    Writing .79 .42
    Construction, Visuospatial, Calculation .42 .79
Pyramids and Palm Trees Test .52 .62
Boston Naming Test .88 .25
Component Construct Language Component Cognitive Component

Bold values indicate the component on which each test loads (i.e., component loadings ≥ .50). Pyramids and Palm Trees Test loaded above .50 on both components and was retained as a complex variable (i.e., contributes to both components when individual subject loadings are extracted).