Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019 Jun 5;104:104370. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.06.005

Table 4a.

Hierarchical Linear Regression Analyses Examining the Differential Impact of Study Predictors on Engagement Outcomes: Motivation Over and Above Internalizing Symptoms

Attendance Engagement PPEM
Predictor β R2 ΔR2 β R2 ΔR2 β R2 ΔR2
Step 1 .19 -- .29 -- .37 --
 Condition −.41+ −.36 −.04
 Ethnicity −.09 .51 −.60
Step 2 .39 .21* .47 .17+ .39 <.01
 Condition −.49 −.39 −.04
 Ethnicity −.14 .38 −.59
 PHQ −.46* −.43 .03
Step 3 .40 .01 .52 .05 .41 .04
 Condition −.48* −.38 .03
 Ethnicity −.13 .44 −.59
 PHQ −.49* −.49 −.05
 PMI .09 .24 .24

Note. PHQ = Patient Health Questionnaire internalizing symptom subscales composite; PMI = Parent Motivation Inventory; Attendance = ratio of sessions attended (late and on time) to sessions attended and scheduled (late, on time, no shows, and cancellations); Engagement = Engagement Measure; PPEM = Parent Participation Engagement Measure Coding System. For Condition, toolkit plus standard care is the reference group and standard care alone is reflected by the higher value. For Ethnicity, Non-Hispanic/Non-Latinx is the reference group and Hispanic/Latinx is reflected by the higher value.

*

p<.05;

+

p<.10.