Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2019 Jun 4;50(7):1727–1733. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024843

Table 2.

Univariate comparisons between patients with superficial cerebellar microbleeds and those with deep/mixed cerebellar microbleeds.

Strictly superficial cerebellar
CMBs

N= 85
Deep/mixed cerebellar
CMBs

N= 50
p-value
Age, years (SD) 70.8 (12.1) 68.1 (13.3) 0.2
Sex (female), n (%) 55 (64.7) 29 (58.0) 0.5
Hypertension, n (%) 74 (87.1) 43 (86.0) 1
Diabetes, n (%) 22 (25.9) 13 (26.0) 1
Hypercholesterolemia, n (%) 37 (43.5) 19 (38.0) 0.6
Warfarin use, n (%) 15 (17.6) 13 (26.0) 0.2
Antiplatelets use, n (%) 38 (44.7) 17 (34.0) 0.3
Presence of supratentorial CMBs, n (%) 57 (67.1) 39 (78.0) 0.2
Lacunes presence, n (%) 36 (42.3) 22 (44.0) 0.8
Severe CSO EPVS > 20, n (%) 36 (42.3) 21 (42.0) 1.0
Severe BG EPVS > 20, n (%) 29 (34.1) 19 (38.0) 0.2
WMH volume, median (IQR) 23.6 (6.6-38.0) 28.9 (12.1-48.7) 0.3
cSS presence, n (%) 14 (16.4) 4 (8.0) 0.2
Diagnosis of Probable CAA,* n (%) 30 (35.3) 8 (16.0) 0.02
Diagnosis of Deep/Mixed ICH, n (%) 40 (47.0) 38 (76.0) 0.001

SD: standard deviation, CMBs: cerebral microbleeds, CSO: centrum semiovale, BG: basal ganglia, CMBs: cerebral microbleeds, EPVS: enlarged perivascular spaces, WMH: white matter hyperintensities, IQR: interquartile range, cSS: cortical superficial siderosis, ICH: intracerebral hemorrhage, CAA: cerebral amyloid angiopathy.