Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):181585. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181585

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

© 2019 The Authors.

Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 3. — Effects of lower willingness to fight and die community ratings (peers-lower) on participants' ratings and self-reported emotions. (a) Right dlPFC activity predicted by change in willingness to fight and die for sacred values overlapped with R dlPFC activity associated with non-sacred value versus sacred value during the willingness to fight and die rating paradigm (small volume correction using R dlPFC mask from non-sacred versus sacred value contrast, T = 3.42, p < 0.05 FWEc, single voxel p < 0.001). The colour bar represents t-values. (b) Significant interaction between feedback type and pre/post-manipulation ratings in willingness to fight and die indicating a change in judgement in alignment with peers (p < 0.008). (c) Sacred values elicited the greater degrees of emotion compared with non-sacred values, with higher reported moral outrage at conflicting feedback (left, p < 0.001) and higher joy at non-conflicting feedback (right, p < 0.002). (*) indicates significant results.