Table 2.
model | summary SMD |
heterogeneity statistics |
forest plot | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
estimatea [95% CI] | p-value | Q17 | p-value | τ2 | I2 (%) | H2 | |||
1 | difference in LTL between time-points | −0.49 [−0.62, −0.36] | <0.0001 | 333.73 | <0.0001 | 0.07 | 95.89 | 24.31 | electronic supplementary material, figure S2a |
2 | assn. between smoking and baseline LTL | −0.10 [−0.16, −0.05] | 0.0003 | 26.55 | 0.0650 | 0.01 | 44.70 | 1.81 | figure 2a |
3 | assn. between smoking and follow-up LTL | −0.15 [−0.29, −0.01] | 0.0312 | 95.13 | <0.0001 | 0.06 | 89.78 | 9.78 | figure 2b |
4 | difference in assn. between smoking and LTL between time-points | −0.05 [−0.16, 0.06] | 0.3884 | 73.45 | <0.0001 | 0.04 | 90.41 | 10.43 | figure 3a |
5 | combined assn. between smoking and LTL across time-points | −0.13 [−0.22, −0.03] | 0.0075 | 85.62 | <0.0001 | 0.03 | 83.96 | 6.24 | not shown |
6 | assn. between smoking and LTL attrition | −0.02 [−0.07, 0.04] | 0.5311 | 24.68 | 0.1021 | 0.00 | 36.48 | 1.57 | figure 4a |
aNegative parameter estimates for the summary standardized mean difference (SMD) correspond to: model 1—shorter LTL at follow-up; models 2, 3 and 5—shorter LTL in smokers; model 4—stronger assn. between smoking and LTL at follow-up; model 6—faster attrition in smokers. Significant associations are shown in italics.