Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 22;2015(7):CD007007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub3

for the main comparison.

Screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) compared with usual care or screening without health professional involvement
Patient or population: women attending healthcare settings for any health‐related reason
 Settings: healthcare
 Intervention: face‐to‐face screening or written/computerised screening with result passed to the healthcare professional
 Comparison: non‐screened women or those whose screening result was not passed on to the healthcare professional or those screened for issues other than IPV
Outcomes Universal screening for IPV Control Effect Number of participants (studies) Quality of the evidence 
 (GRADE)
Relative effect 
 (95% CI) Absolute effect 
 (95% CI)
Identification of IPV by health professionals (assessed immediately or up to 1 month) 259/5006 (5.2%) 86/5068 (1.7%) OR 2.95 
 (1.79 to 4.87) 31 more per 1000 (from 13 more to 61 more) 10,074 (8 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1
1.7% 31 more per 1000 (from 13 more to 60 more)
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Antenatal clinics 24/317 (7.6%) 6/346 (1.7%) OR 4.53 
 (1.82 to 11.27) 57 more per 1000 (from 14 more to 149 more) 663 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate2
1.7% 55 more per 1000 (from 13 more to 145 more)
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Maternal health services 51/594 (8.6%) 9/235 (3.8%) OR 2.36 
 (1.14 to 4.87) 48 more per 1000 (from 5 more to 124 more) 829 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate3
3.8% 48 more per 1000 (from 5 more to 124 more)
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Emergency departments 71/1218 (5.8%) 36/1390 (2.6%) OR 2.72 
 (1.03 to 7.19) 42 more per 1000 (from 1 more to 135 more) 2608 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate1
1.2% 20 more per 1000 (from 0 fewer to 67 more)
Identification of IPV by type of healthcare setting ‐ Hospital‐based primary care 25/144 (17.4%) 18/149 (12.1%) OR 1.53 
 (0.79 to 2.94) 53 more per 1000 (from 23 fewer to 167 more) 293 (1 study) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 Moderate3
12.1% 53 more per 1000 (from 23 fewer to 167 more)
Referrals (assessed immediately) 7/555 (1.3%) 4/743 (0.5%) OR 2.24 
 (0.64 to 7.86) 7 more per 1000 (from 2 fewer to 35 more) 1298 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 Low4
0.6% 7 more per 1000 (from 2 fewer to 39 more)
CI: confidence interval; GRADE: Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; IPV: intimate partner violence; OR: odds ratio.
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

1Downgraded due to heterogeneity.
 2Downgraded due to imprecision.
 3Downgraded due to risk of bias.
 4Downgraded due to imprecision and risk of bias.