Methods | RCT (Randomised Controlled Trial), multicentre (USA) | |
Participants | Patients with resectable Dukes B, C (TNM stage II‐III) rectal cancer (n=574) | |
Interventions | 3‐arm trial: patients were randomized to receive: A) surgery alone (n=191), or B) surgery + adjuvant radiotherapy (n=190), or C) surgery + adjuvant chemotherapy with 5‐FU, semustine, and vincristine (n=193). | |
Outcomes | Disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) | |
Notes | In this meta‐analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy, arm C (adjuvant chemotherapy) was compared to arm A (no adjuvant chemotherapy). At subgroup analysis, the authors reported that both DFS and OS were significantly improved by adjuvant chemotherapy in males |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | A ‐ Adequate |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | |
Other bias | Low risk |