Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004078.pub2
Methods RCT (Randomised Controlled Trial); multicentre (USA)
Participants Patients undergoing curative resection of Dukes´B and C (TNM stage II‐III) rectal cancer (n=202)
Interventions 4‐arm trial: patients were randomized to: A) surgery alone (n=58), or B) adjuvant chemotherapy (n=48), or C) adjuvant radiotherapy (n=50), or D) adjuvant radio‐chemotherapy (n=46)
Chemotherapy: 5‐FU + semustine
Outcomes Disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)
Notes No stratification between B and C
In this meta‐analysis we compared patients randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy (n=48) versus those randomized to surgery alone (n=58)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk
Other bias Low risk