Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 28;16(12):ijrm.v16i12.3680. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v16i12.3680

Table 2.

BaP's effect on endometrial morphology in the pregnant mice (n = 8).


Groups Endometrial Epithelium (µm) Lumen (µm) Gland (N/HPF)* Vessel (N/HPF)* Endometrial Diameter (µm) Stromal Cell (N/HPF)*
C 24.4 ± 5.01 137.1 ± 13.99 10.96 ± 2.43 14.14 ± 2.74 609.7 ± 137.5 134.9 ± 11.97
SH 21.1 ± 2.81 122.2 ± 28.84 10.13 ± 1.65 12.76 ± 1.61 553.6 ± 143.4 133.4 ± 25.92
B1 18.86 ± 1.40a 173 ± 40.11 7.33 ± 1.99a 7.18 ± 1.48a 417.2 ± 95.3a 96.25 ± 18.71a
B2 15.11 ± 4.07a 213.9 ± 40.63a 6.77 ± 1.71a 6.93 ± 1.53a 320.4 ± 69.87a 96.13 ± 11.41a
B5 13.7 ± 1.09ab 280.4 ± 52.34abc 7.53 ± 2.24a 7.49 ± 2.28a 439.2 ± 35.18a 87.97 ± 12.82a

Note: The values are as mean ± SD (p < 0.05);

*: Number of cross-sections per high power field (HPF);

a: Comparing diverse BaP-receiving groups with the control group, b: Comparing B5 and B2 with B1, and c: B5 with B2;

C: The control group received normal saline;

SH: The Sham group receiving corn oil;

B1: The group receiving BaP as 100 µg/kg;

B2: The group receiving BaP as 200 µg/kg;

B5: The group receiving BaP as 500 µg/kg.