Table 7.
The antiradical activity of extracts of different parts of walnut fruit against various ROS, RNS, and other radicals.
No | Free Radicals | Plant Part | Unit | Content | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ROS | H2O2 | Kernel | Scavenging (%) b | 239.80 ± 2.00 | [182] |
Husk | Scavenging (%) b | 236.86 ± 3.40 | [182] | |||
O2•– | Kernel | Scavenging (%) c | 63.89 ± 0.100 | [67] | ||
Scavenging (%) b | 98.48 ± 4.2 | [182] | ||||
Skin | Scavenging (%) c | 128.48 ± 2.12 | [67] | |||
Shell | Scavenging (%) c | 108.12 ± 2.04 | [67] | |||
EC50 (µg/mL) a | 173.41 ± 3.56 | [140] | ||||
Husk | Scavenging (%) c | 244.76 ± 1.52 | [67] | |||
Scavenging (%) b | 98.48 ± 7.20 | [182] | ||||
HO• | Shell | EC50 (µg/mL) a | 97.32 ± 3.29 | [140] | ||
2 | RNS | •NO | Kernel | Scavenging (%) c | 9.87 ± 1.82 | [67] |
Scavenging (%) b | 54.68±1.56 | [182] | ||||
Skin | Scavenging (%) c | 68.50 ± 1.97 | [67] | |||
Shell | Scavenging (%) c | 70.26 ± 2.19 | [67] | |||
Husk | IC50 (μg/mL) a | 141 ± 0.4 | [71] | |||
Scavenging (%) c | 69.18 ± 1.57 | [67] | ||||
Scavenging (%) b | 60.45 | [103] | ||||
Scavenging (%) b | 31.35 ± 1.70 | [182] | ||||
3 | Other radicals | DPPH• | Kernel | ppm BHTEs | 92.6 ± 39.5 | [154] |
EC50 (mg/mL) | 0.15 | [69] | ||||
EC50 (g/DM/g DPPH) | 4.05 ± 0.21 | [207] | ||||
EC50 (mg/mL extract) | 0.143 ± 0.020 | [131] | ||||
µmol TEs/g FW | 120 ± 10 | [176] | ||||
Scavenging (%) c | 1.2 ± 0.10 | [67] | ||||
µmol TEs/g sample | 191 ± 4.2 | [178] | ||||
mmol TEs/100 g sample | 25.7 ± 2.1 | [200] | ||||
mmol TEs/100 g DW | 20.42 ± 3.84 | [66] | ||||
Scavenging (%) b | 40 ± 1 | [181] | ||||
EC50 (mg/mL) | 0.19 ± 0.02 | [139] | ||||
Scavenging (%) b | 27.48 ± 1.01 | [182] | ||||
Skin | ppm BHTEs | 286 ± 2.72 | [154] | |||
Scavenging (%) c | 73.33 ± 1.18 | [67] | ||||
Scavenging (%) b | 92.8 ± 0.4 | [159] | ||||
mmol TEs/100 g DW | 303.01 ± 59.15 | [66] | ||||
Shell | Scavenging (%) c | 7.19 ± 0.11 | [67] | |||
EC50 (µg/mL) a | 81.03 ± 2.31 | [140] | ||||
IC50 (μg/mL) a | 10.3 ± 0.8 | [56] | ||||
Husk | EC50 (mg/mL) | 0.35 | [73] | |||
EC50 (mg/mL extract) | 0.412 ± 0.025 | [131] | ||||
IC50 (μg/mL) a | 122 ± 4.5 | [71] | ||||
Scavenging (%) c | 12.83 ± 0.08 | [67] | ||||
EC50 (mg/mL) | 0.33 ± 0.02 | [103] | ||||
IC50 (μg/mL) a | 33.98 | [161] | ||||
IC50 (μg/mL) a | 54.9 | [18] | ||||
IC50 (μg/mL) a | 114 ± 1.4 | [56] | ||||
SC50 (μg/mL) | 85 ± 1.6 | [102] | ||||
Scavenging (%) b | 89.81 ± 1.21 | [182] | ||||
ABTS•+ | Kernel | µmol TEs/100 g DW | 7713 ± 176 | [28] | ||
mmol TEs/100 g DW a | 0.2 | [156] | ||||
mmol TEs/100 g sample | 21.4 ± 2 | [200] | ||||
Husk | IC50 (μg/mL) a | 324.8 | [18] | |||
6µmol TEs/g extract | 1251 ± 16 | [203] |
a indicating the lowest reported value; b indicating the highest reported value; c indicating the mean of reported values. Abbreviations: EC50: effective concentration of 50%; IC50: inhibitory concentration of 50%; BHTEs: butyl hydroxytoluene equivalents; DM: dry matter; FW: fresh weight; TEs: Trolox equivalents; DW: dry weight; SC50: scavenging capacity of 50%.