. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Appl Biomech. 2018 Jul 26;34(5):354–360. doi: 10.1123/jab.2017-0207

Table 1:

Linear regression analysis for games vs practice and study wide 50^th and 95^th percentile peak linear acceleration, peak rotational acceleration and peak HITsp for the season, practices and games.

		Season	Practice	Game	Slope of best fit	p-value	r²
50^th %	Linear Acc (g)	18.3[17.1–19.3]	18.2[16.6–19.4]	18.4[16.8–19.8]	0.54 ± 0.09	p < 0.001	0.21
	Rotational Acc (rad.s⁻²)	1305.4[1188.2–1397.4]	1290.0[1151.0–1404.0]	1337.0[1217.0–1441.0]	0.79 ± 0.07	p < 0.001	0.46
	HITsp	13.7[13.2–14.2]	13.6[13.0–14.2]	13.9[13.1–14.5]	0.83 ± 0.08	p < 0.001	0.42
95^th %	Linear Acc (g)	46.9[40.5–52.5]	47.0[38.8–52.9]	46.5[40.8–54.1]	0.46 ± 0.06	p < 0.001	0.28
	Rotational Acc (rad.s⁻²)	3316.6[2852.3–3664.9]	3187.0[2772.0–3658.0]	3278.0[2844.0–3920.0]	0.49 ± 0.09	p < 0.001	0.18
	HITsp	24.3[22.0–27.3]	24.1[21.4–27.2]	24.9[21.4–28.2]	0.60± 0.07	p < 0.001	0.34

Note. Results expressed as mean + SD. Results expressed as Median [25th-75th] percentile

Symbolizes significance difference between accelerations at practice and games