Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 10;116(26):12654–12659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821231116

Table 1.

CO2 hydrogenation using different catalysts

Entry Catalyst Solvent Selectivity (C-mol%) Activity (mmolCO2·gcat−1·h−1)
CO C1–4 C5+ ROH
1* Co6/MnOx squalane 0.4 46.4 53.2 0 15.1
2 Co6/MnOx squalane 0
3 Co0 squalane 0.6 80.7 18.7 0 1.7
4 CoO squalane 0 0 0 0 0
5 Co3O4 squalane 0 0 0 0 0
6 Mn squalane 0 0 0 0 0
7 MnO squalane 0 0 0 0 0
8 MnO2 squalane 0 0 0 0 0
9 Co14/MnOx squalane 0.5 58.5 41.0 0 6.6
10 Co10/MnOx squalane 0.5 47.2 52.3 0 11.2
11 Co2/MnOx squalane 0.4 76.2 23.4 0 13.3
12 Co6/ZnOx squalane 0.1 80.7 19.2 0 4.8
13 Co6/AlOx squalane 0.1 94.2 5.7 0 4.1
14 Co6/CeOx squalane 0.4 89.8 9.8 0 6.3
15 Co6/MnOx 0.7 60.9 38.4 0 11.3
16 Co6/MnOx cyclohexane 0.4 48.3 51.3 0 14.7
17 Co6/MnOx benzene 0.5 95.3 4.2 0 7.9
18 Co6/MnOx DMI 0.6 87.6 6.8 5.0 2.6
19 Co6/MnOx water 0.3 92.9 0 6.8 3.2

Reaction conditions: 20 mg of catalyst, 1.0 mL of solvent (squalane), 200 °C, 15 h, initial pressure 8 MPa (CO2/H2 = 1).

*

The conversion of CO2 was 15.3%, and the selectivity of paraffin in the total hydrocarbons was 78.1 C-mol%; moreover, the selectivity of paraffin in the C5+ products was 67.2 C-mol%.

No CO2 was added. The error of activity was ±1.0 mmolCO2·gcat−1·h−1 and the error of selectivity was ±1.5 C-mol%, which were obtained by three repeated experiments.