Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;2019(7):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub3

Comparison 9. CDC versus individual doffing.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Gown; Contamination with fluor marker 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 small patch 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 large patch 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 hand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.4 shoe 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.5 underwear 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.6 environment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Apron; Contamination with fluor marker 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 small patch 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 large patch 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 hand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 shoe 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.5 underwear 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.6 environment 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]