Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;2019(7):CD011621. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011621.pub3

Comparison 10. Doffing with double gloves versus doffing with single gloves.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Contamination: virus detected 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 All body parts 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Face 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Shirt 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.4 Pants 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Contamination: virus quantity 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Dominant hand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Non‐dominant hand 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 Face 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.4 Shirt 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.5 Pants 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Non‐compliance: any error 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected