Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):216–224. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-020011

Table 1. Participants’ demographic characteristics and scores on cognition, activities of daily living, and frailty status, stratified by level of formal education in months (n = 540). São Carlos, Brazil, 2014.

  Total
(N = 540)
No education
(n = 145)a
12-24 months of
education
(n = 113)b
25-48 months of
education
(n = 282)c
Age (min 60; max 98), Means (95 CI)±1 72.1 (71.4-72.7) 75.5 (74.0-77.0) 70.9 (69.5-72.3) 71.0 (69.9-71.6)
Sex (male), % #1 44.1 42.8 42.5 45.4
Setting (rural), % #2 75.0 89.0 (0.3: 0.2-0.5) 69.0 (1.0: 0.6-1.7) 70.2 (1.0)
Living with someone in marital-like relationship, %#3 89.1 82.1 (2.3: 1.3-4.3) 92.0 (0.9: 0.4-2.1) 91.5 (1.0)
Occupation, % Retired 63.9 68.3 54.0 65.6
Retired with casual work 12.0 11.7 10.6 12.8
In full-time work 5.6 2.8 5.3 7.1
Doing unpaid work 18.5 17.2 30.1 14.5
Cognition: MMSE (max score 30) Means (95 CI)±2 21.00 (20.6-21.4) 17.0 (16.3-17.9) 20.1 (19.3-21.0) 23.3 (22.9-23.8)
Proportion of older adults who scored below cut-off (MMSE), % 44.3 73.1 60.2 23.0
IADL: Lawton & Brody Index (max score 21) Means (95 CI) ±3 16.6 (16.2-16.9) 14.6 (13.9-15.3) 17.4 (16.7-18.0) 17.2 (16.8-17.7)
IADLs: totally dependent, % 4.3 6.49 2.7 3.5
IADLs: partially dependent, % 75.0 82.1 75.2 71.3
Frailty criteria (n of factors max 5) Means (95 CI)±4 1.7 (1.6-1.8) 2.2 (1.9-2.4) 1.7 (1.4-1.9) 1.5 (1.4-1.8)
Frail, % 27.6 40.0 29.2 20.6
Pre-frail, % 52.2 46.2 52.2 55.3
Non-frail, % 20.2 13.8 18.6 24.1
±

ANOVA one-way:

±1

F = 19.2; p < 0.01; a≠b, a≠c, b = c.

±2

F = 104.1; p < 0.01; a≠b, a≠c, b≠c.

±3

F = 23.8; p < 0.01;a≠b, a≠c, b = c.

±4

F = 11.5; p < 0.01; a≠b, a≠c, b = c.

#

Pearson Chi-square test.

#1

Stat = 0.4; p = 0.812; a = b, a = c, c = b.

#2

Stat = 20.6; p < 0.01; a≠b, a≠c, b = c.

#3

Stat = 10.0; p < 0.01; a≠b, a≠c, b = c.

MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination. IADLs: instrumental activities of daily living.