Skip to main content
. 2019 May 1;8(7):3339–3348. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2210

Table 3.

Quality of histologic specimen (n = 30)

Quantity of tissue
0: sample with no material, n 0
Cytology (1‐2), n (%) 2 (6.7%)
1: sufficient material for limited cytologic interpretation but probably not representative, n 1
2: sufficient material for adequate cytologic interpretation but insufficient for histologic information, n 1
Histology (3‐5), n (%) 28 (93.3%)
3: sufficient material for limited histologic interpretation, n 8
4: sufficient material for adequate histologic interpretation but a low quality sample, na 9
5: sufficient material for adequate histologic interpretation and a high quality sample, nb 11
Contamination
1: contamination present in >50% of the slide, n 1 (3.3%)
2: contamination present in 25‐50% of the slide, n 3 (10.0%)
3: contamination present in <25% of the slide, n 26 (86.7%)
Amount of blood
1: significant, n 10 (33.3%)
2: moderate, n 11 (36.7%)
3: minimal, n 9 (30.0%)
a

Low quality sample, total material within a 10 power field in length.

b

High quality sample, total material more than a 10 power field in length.