Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;36(31):8103–8111. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0045-16.2016

Table 1.

Regions exhibiting stronger activation at T1 for later remembered compared with later forgotten face-word pairs

Region MNI coordinates
Voxels (n) z-Max
x y z
Subsequent memory effect (rem > forg) at T1
    Right lateral occipital cortex 34 −88 18 3030 4.25
    Left inferior temporal gyrus −40 −54 −18 2116 4.69
    Left inferior frontal gyrus/frontal pole −42 42 −6 1662 3.91
    Bilateral superior frontal gyrus −2 52 44 1381 4.69
    Right hippocampus/amygdala 20 −6 −14 1010 4.27
    Left hippocampus/amygdala −16 −4 −12 509 3.88
    Bilateral ventromedial PFC −4 48 −14 401 3.73
    Left lateral occipital cortex −48 −70 36 310 3.55
    Right inferior frontal gyrus 56 34 12 256 3.60
    Right precentral gyrus 48 8 30 221 3.79
    Left superior frontal gyrus −6 20 54 187 3.16
Diagnosis (rem > forg) > Name (rem > forg) at T1
    Right angular gyrus 54 −48 28 246 3.37
    Frontal pole 32 64 6 220 3.31
    Right paracingulate gyrus 8 48 26 169 2.90
    Bilateral precuneus −2 −58 62 158 3.13
    Right middle temporal gyrus 70 −28 −8 148 3.36
Name (rem > forg) > Diagnosis (rem > forg) at T1
    Left lateral occipital cortex −42 −78 −6 382 3.28
    Left precentral gyrus −46 −4 46 227 3.63
    Right lateral occipital cortex 38 −58 −6 224 3.78

Regions exhibiting stronger activation at T1 for later remembered as compared to later forgotten diagnoses or names (Subsequent memory effect, top). Regions exhibiting a stronger subsequent memory effect for diagnoses than for names, and vice versa, at T1 (condition × memory interaction, bottom). Voxel threshold, z > 2.3; cluster threshold, p < 0.05. rem, Remembered; forg, forgotten.