Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2019 May 20;97:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.020

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Indirect effect of Feedback 2 (X) on intentions (Y) through marijuana attitude ambivalence (M1) and attitudes (M2). Feedback 2 (indirect confrontation) was coded as 1 (n = 38); all other conditions were coded as 0 (n = 63). When modeling the relationship between the treatment (x) and intentions (y) total effects are modeled outside parentheses; direct effects are shown inside parentheses. The indirect effect of Treatment (X) → Ambivalence (M1) → Attitudes (M2) → Intentions (Y) is statistically significant, B = −.07, SE = .03, 90% CI [−.125, −.031].

Note. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.