Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2019 May 18;198:114–124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.037

Table 2:

Quantitative comparison with other topological correction methods on human infant MRI dataset with real topological errors. The symbol * indicates our proposed AC-U-Net method is significantly better than the competing methods (p < 0.05) based on the paired t-test in terms of DR.

Method SR DR (mean ± std) ASD (mean ± std)
*Brainsuite 15.63% 97.30 ± 1.71% 0.031 ± 0.021 mm
*FreeSurfer 83.04% 85.59 ± 3.16% 0.203 ± 0.079 mm
*TPLS 84.38% 97.42 ± 1.67% 0.031 ± 0.024 mm
*SDLM 90.63% 93.67 ± 1.60% 0.063 ± 0.029 mm
*U-Net(ours) 91.52% 97.63 ± 1.37% 0.024 ± 0.015 mm
AC-U-Net(ours) 92.41% 98.78 ± 0.78% 0.013 ± 0.010 mm