Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 1;9:9423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45962-x

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Experimental workflow. The experimental design included the four following treatments (panel A): (i) control samples; (ii) aPDI-treated samples; (iii) aBL-treated samples; and (iv) CIP-treated samples. For the proper implementation of the study, all of the S. aureus cultures described above (from the 1st, 5th, 10th and 15th cycles) were tested to demonstrate (panel B): (i) a treatment-induced change in the mutation rate; (ii) a treatment-induced change in the susceptibility to H2O2; (iii) a treatment-induced change in the susceptibility to selected antimicrobials (GEN, DOX, VAN, CHL and RIF); (iv) whether developed tolerance is limited to the selection treatment or translates to other phototreatments; and (v) the phenotypic stability of the developed tolerance. In addition, whether sub-lethal aPDI and aBL lead to increased umuC expression levels was tested.