Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jul 1;9:9467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45768-x

A novel method for rapid detection of a Helicobacter pylori infection using a γ-glutamyltranspeptidase-activatable fluorescent probe

Taro Akashi 1, Hajime Isomoto 2,, Kayoko Matsushima 1, Mako Kamiya 3,4, Tsutomu Kanda 2, Masayuki Nakano 5,6, Takumi Onoyama 2, Masashi Fujii 2, Junko Akada 7, Yuko Akazawa 1, Ken Ohnita 1, Fuminao Takeshima 1, Kazuhiko Nakao 1, Yasuteru Urano 3,4,
PMCID: PMC6603024  PMID: 31263136

Abstract

A γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green probe (gGlu-HMRG) reacts with γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) and immediately produces fluorescence, is clinically applied for real-time cancers’ visualization. Since Helicobacter pylori produces GGT, this study aimed to investigate whether gGlu-HMRG can be used to detect H. pylori infections. A wild-type H. pylori strain and the ggt gene-disrupted mutant were cultured and treated with gGlu-HMRG. This fluorescent probe assay was used to quantify GGT activity of H. pylori ex vivo using gastric biopsy specimens. The H. pylori diagnostic capabilities of the assay were determined from altered fluorescence intensity (FI) values at 5 min (FIV-5) and 15 minutes (FIV-15). Distinct fluorescence was identified in wild H. pylori strain, using gGlu-HMRG, whereas no fluorescence was observed in ggt gene-disrupted mutant strain. On ex vivo imaging of gGlu-HMRG, fluorescence intensity increased markedly with time in H. pylori-positive specimens; however, the H. pylori-negative specimens displayed a slight increase in FI. FIV-5 and FIV-15 differed significantly between H. pylori-positive and -negative specimens. FIV-15 differed significantly between H. pylori-positive and -eradicated group. This assay sensitivity and specificity were 75.0% and 83.3% in the antrum and 82.6% and 89.5% in the stomach body. GGT-activatable fluorescence probe is applicable for rapid diagnosis of H. pylori.

Subject terms: Fluorescence imaging, Gastritis

Introduction

γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) is a prototypical hepatic enzyme; however, it is expressed on the plasma membranes of most cells1. GGT is notably overexpressed in cells and tissues in various cancers, engaging in cellular glutathione homeostasis and promoting tumor progression and invasion and chemotherapeutic resistance2.

Helicobacter pylori infections are one of the most common worldwide, inducing chronic gastric mucosal inflammation, atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia; ultimately, some individuals with chronic infection develop gastric cancer3. Thus, accurate diagnosis of this infection is clinically critical. H. pylori reportedly produces conservative GGT4. H. pylori GGT converts extracellular glutamine and glutathione to glutamate and transports it into host cells, wherein glutamate is incorporated into the tricarboxylic acid cycle or used for glutamine synthesis5. Consequently, H. pylori GGT hence deprives cells of extracellular glutamine and glutathione, produces ammonia, and increases reactive oxygen species levels4. GGT facilitates gastric colonization of H. pylori6, induces apoptosis in gastric epithelial cells4, and inhibits T-cell proliferation and dendritic cell differentiation710. Thus, GGT plays an important role in the pathogenesis of H. pylori infections, resulting in gastric mucosal injuries. Moreover, a previous study reported a significant increase in GGT activity of H. pylori isolates obtained from individuals with peptic ulcers than in those with non-ulcer dyspepsia11.

Urano et al. developed an enzymatically activatable fluorescent probe, γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green (gGlu-HMRG), which is non-fluorescent under a normal cellular environment but becomes highly fluorescent upon enzymatic catalysis of GGT12. This enhanced GGT in cells and tissues in various cancers potentially reacts with gGlu-HMRG and emits strong fluorescence for a rather short duration13,14. Thus, the gGlu-HMRG assay is a potentially novel cancer diagnostic method. Owing to the hydrophobic nature of HMRG, it rapidly penetrates the plasma membrane, subsequently accumulating primarily in intracellular lysosomes and enhancing fluorescence specifically in enzyme-expressing cells12.

This study aimed to investigate whether gGlu-HMRG emits fluorescence upon reacting with GGT produced by H. pylori. An ex vivo imaging assay for GGT activity with gGlu-HMRG was conducted to detect H. pylori infection using clinical samples.

Methods

Reagents

gGlu-HMRG, an activatable fluorescent imaging probe, was synthesized as previously described12. A 10-mM stock solution of gGlu-HMRG was stored at −20 °C until use. A 10-mM solution of gGlu-HMRG was thawed at room temperature and diluted to 50 μM in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)12.

In vitro gGlu-HMRG imaging analyses using laboratory H. pylori strains

H. pylori strain 26695 was used as a standard strain in this study. The ggt gene-disrupted mutant of H. pylori strain 26695 was kindly provided by Dr. Keigo Shibayama (National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan). H. pylori strains were cultured in Brucella broth (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C for 48 h with agitation under microanaerobic conditions and washed with PBS, and a 108 cells/ml bacterial suspension was prepared in PBS.

To carry out the reaction with gGlu-HMRG in vitro, H. pylori suspensions of both the wild-type and the ggt gene-disrupted mutant strains were serially diluted 10-fold with PBS as indicated, i.e., 10 to 108 cells/ml. gGlu-HMRG was also diluted with PBS and adjusted to 50 μM. Thereafter, 16 μl of each diluted H. pylori strain was placed in strips of 8 tubes and treated with 4 μl of prepared gGlu-HMRG. Fluorescence excitation was quantified for 15 min as reported previsouly15. To carry out the reaction with GGT inhibitor in vitro, H. pylori suspensions were centrifuged and separated into supernatant and pellet fractions. The pellet fraction was remixed with the same amount of PBS. Sixteen microliters of supernatant or remixed pellet was added to 4 μl of gGlu-HMRG adjusted to 50 μM, or 4 μl of a solution of gGlu-HMRG adjusted to 50 μM plus GGT inhibitor adjusted to 250 μM and observed for 10 min. GGsTop (ako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd, Osaka, Japan) was used as the GGT inhibitor. In vitro experiments were performed at room temperature.

Human gastric samples

Patients (n = 46; 31 men, 15 women; mean age, 63.8 ± 8.85 and 70.1 ± 12.4 years, respectively) who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy were enrolled in this study. The Nagasaki University Hospital ethics committee approved the study (#15012681) and patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study. Patients were considered H. pylori-positive when either the urea breath test or rapid urease test or both tests yielded positive outcome. On the other hand patients were considered H. pylori-negative when both the urea breath tests and rapid urease tests yielded negative outcome. As a whole, there were 21 H. pylori-positive cases (45.7%) and 25 H. pylori-negative cases (54.3%). Nevertheless, in cases of severe gastric atrophy, even considered H. pylori-negative via the urea breath and rapid urease testing, spontaneous eradication may occur owing to severe atrophy accompanied by extensive intestinal metaplasia; hence, such cases were further assessed via the stool antigen test, which revealed negative outcome in each case, thus deeming such 4 patients H. pylori-negative. Four cases underwent eradication therapy and successful eradication was confirmed at least one month after eradication therapy, the duration after eradication ranging 11 months to 6 years. As the definition, H. pylori-negative group included 17 H. pylori-infection-free cases and 4 possibly H. pylori-spontaneous-eradication cases, discriminating from the really H. pylori-eradicated group via successful eradication therapy (4 H. pylori-eradication-success cases). Collectively, the patients enrolled in this study were divided into following the 3 groups; the H. pylori-positive group (n = 21), the H. pylori-negative group (n = 21) and the H. pylori-eradicated group (n = 4). Separate biopsy samples were harvested from the antrum and the stomach body of each patient and rinsed with PBS. A neutral pH was confirmed using a litmus paper. The samples were subjected to ex vivo imaging tests for gGlu-HMRG.

Ex vivo gGlu-HMRG imaging tests using stomach specimens

Each stomach specimen was treated with 20 μl of gGlu-HMRG adjusted to 50 μM, placed in the dark, and exposed to light at an excitation wavelength of 470 nm at room temperature (Limited-STAGE, ALB-470, AMZ, Osaka, Japan). The specimens were photographed using a commercially available digital camera at 1, 5, and 15 min after initial exposure to gGlu-HMRG. Fluorescence intensities (FI) were quantified in the photographed images, using Image J 1.50 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA)12. The values obtained by subtracting the FI 5 min after treatment with gGlu-HMRG from FI at 5 (defined as FIV-5) and 15 minutes (defined as FIV-15) were used to assess the diagnostic capability of the assay to detect H. pylori infection.

H. pylori/GGT double-immunofluorescence staining

Stomach biopsy specimens (antrum and stomach body) of H. pylori-positive patients were fixed with formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sliced into 4-μm-thick sections. Tissue sections were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed via heat treatment with a Target Retrieval Solution (DAKO North America, Inc., Carponteria, CA, USA) diluted with distilled water. Thereafter, sections were incubated with Protein Block Serum Free solution (DAKO North America, Inc.) at room temperature for 20 min. An anti-H. pylori rabbit polyclonal antibody (DAKO North America, Inc.; 1:150) and a mouse monoclonal anti-human GGT antibody (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan; 1:150) were applied as primary antibodies and incubated with the tissue sections in a humidified chamber overnight at 4 °C. The slide was washed thrice in PBS with Tween-20 (PBS-T) for 5 min each. Thereafter, Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA; 1:200) and Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen; 1:200) were applied as secondary antibodies and incubated with the tissue sections for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The slide was washed thrice in PBS-T for 5 min each. Fluorescence microscopic images were obtained using an All-in-One Fluorescence Microscope (BZ-X700; KEYENCE Japan, Osaka, Japan), and images were captured at × 1000 magnification.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro 13.0.0 for Macintosh OS (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to compare the mean values between 3 groups (H. pylori-positive vs. H. pylori-negative vs. H. pylori-eradicated one). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained from logistic regression analysis, and the optimum cutoff FIVs were determined using the Youden Index. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between the results of gGlu-HMRG assay and the Kyoto classification of gastritis3. Variables for logistic regression analysis were selected in a stepwise manner. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

GGT activity assessed using gGlu-HMRG in laboratory H. pylori strains

We investigated whether gGlu-HMRG was activated by GGT produced by H. pylori cells in vitro. Experiments were performed using both the wild-type and the ggt-gene disrupted mutant strains at densities ranging from 10 to 108 cells/ml. Both strains were treated with gGlu-HMRG, and fluorescence was observed for 15 min. Wild-type H. pylori emitted fluorescence; the FI tended to increase with an increase in cell density (Fig. 1a). At low cell densities, even the wild-type H. pylori strain emitted slight fluorescence upon exposure to gGlu-HMRG. In contrast, the ggt-gene disrupted mutant strain did not emit fluorescence upon gGlu-HMRG exposure even at high cell densities (Fig. 1b). Fluorescence emitted immediately after probe addition and the FI remained unchanged at 1 min. However, FI increased at 5 min and more distinctly at 15 min (Fig. 1a,c), displaying substantial alterations in FIV-5 and FIV-15. Notably, treatment with the GGT inhibitor suppressed fluorescence emission by the wild-type strain (Fig. 2). Upon centrifugation of the suspension, green fluorescence was again detected both in the bacterial pellet and the supernatant, albeit slightly greater in the former (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) The H. pylori strain 26695 and the ggt gene-disrupted mutant strain were cultured and reacted with 50 μM of γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green probe (gGlu-HRMG) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Experiments were performed at densities ranging from 10 cells/ml to 108 cells/ml. The wild-type H. pylori strain emitted green fluorescence over time. (b) The ggt-gene disrupted mutant strain emitted nil fluorescence upon gGlu-HMRG exposure for 15 min, even at high cell densities. (c) Fluorescence intensity (FI) remained unchanged at 1 min. FI increased at 5 and more distinctly at 15 min, displaying substantial alterations in FIV-5 and FIV-15; values obtained by subtracting FI 5 min after treatment with gGlu-HMRG, FIV-15; FI at 15 min after treatment with gGlu-HMRG, respectively, are observed.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The wild-type laboratory strain was centrifuged and separated into supernatant and pellet fractions. Each fraction was treated with 50 μM of gGlu-HMRG with or without an inhibitor of γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT). Addition of the GGT inhibitor suppressed green fluorescence by the wild-type strain. Fluorescence was observed in both fractions, albeit at a greater intensity in the former.

Ex vivo imaging analysis of gGlu-HMRG using stomach biopsy specimens

Two separate stomach biopsy specimens (the antrum and the stomach body) from each patient were treated with gGlu-HMRG. FI was determined over time (at 1, 5, and 15 min). In specimens obtained from the representative H. pylori-positive patients, the fluorescent signal was immediately detected no more than 5 min after gGlu-HMRG treatment (Fig. 3a), and FI increased with time in both the antrum and stomach body specimens (Fig. 3b). However, in specimens obtained from H. pylori-negative patients, the FI was rather weak, irrespective of the sampling sites (Fig. 3a), displaying only a slight but not significant elevation in FI (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, FIV-15 differed significantly between the H. pylori-positive and the H. pylori-negative group either in antral specimens (p = 0.001) or in the stomach body specimens (p = 0.0006) (Fig. 4a). Upon ROC analysis, the cut-off FIV-15 was at 43.667 and 18.316, for antral specimens and for the stomach body specimens, respectively (Fig. 4b). The sensitivity and specificity of ex vivo H. pylori GGT-activatable fluorescence assay were 75.0% (18/24) and 83.3% (15/18), respectively, for antral specimens, and 82.6% (19/23) and 89.5% (17/19), respectively, for the stomach body specimens (Fig. 4b). The positive and negative predicted values for the assessment of H. pylori status were 85.7% (18/21) and 71.4% (15/21), respectively, for antral specimens, and 90.5% (19/21) and 81.0% (17/21), respectively, for the stomach body specimens. Again, FIV-5 differed significantly between the H. pylori-positive and the H. pylori-negative group either in antral specimens (p = 0.0023) or in the stomach body specimens (p = 0.0469) (Fig. 5).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Gastric biopsy specimens were treated with 50 μM gGlu-HMRG, one obtained from the antrum and the other from the stomach body. In specimens obtained from a H. pylori-positive patient, the fluorescent signal was immediately detected no more than 5 min after treatment with gGlu-HMRG, and strong fluorescence was emitted both in antral and stomach body specimens. However, in specimens from obtained from a H. pylori-negative patient, the fluorescence was rather weak, irrespective of sampling sites. (b) Fluorescence intensity increased with time, increasing substantially at 15 min after gGlu-HMRG treatment and increasing slightly in H. pylori-negative specimens.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(a) The values obtained by subtracting FI at 1 min after treatment with gGlu-HMRG from FI at 15 min (defined as FIV-15) were compared between the H. pylori-negative and the H.pylori–positive group. There were significant differences in FIV-15 between the 2 groups both in antral and the stomach body specimens. (b) The optimum threshold for FIV-15 was determined for the antrum and stomach body via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. AUC: Area under the Curve, PPV: Positive Predictive Value, NPV: Negative Predictive Value.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The values obtained by subtracting FI at 1 min after treatment with gGlu-HMRG from FI at 5 min (defined as FIV-5) were compared between the H. pylori-negative group and the H.pylori-positive patients. There were significant differences in FIV-5 between the 2 groups in both antral and the stomach body specimens.

FIV-15 differed significantly between the H. pylori-positive and the H. pylori-eradicated group either in antral specimens (p = 0.0195) or in the stomach body specimens (p = 0.0068) (Fig. 6a). However, the FIV-15 did not differed significantly between the H. pylori-negative and the H. pylori-eradicated group either in antral specimens (p = 0.2506) or in the stomach body specimens (p = 0.4364) (Fig. 6b).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(a) The FIV-15 of specimens obtained from the H. pylori-positive group were significantly greater than the FI of specimens obtained from the H. pylori-eradicated group upon assessment of antral (left panel) and the stomach body (right panel) specimens. (b) There were no significant FIV-15 between the H. pylori-eradicated group and the H. pylori-negative group.

Co-localization of H. pylori and GGT in stomach biopsy specimens via double-immunofluorescence staining

Immunofluorescence staining was performed to visualize the expression of H. pylori GGT in H. pylori-positive stomach biopsy specimens. Using the H. pylori-positive antral biopsy specimens, H. pylori fluorescence (green fluorescence) and GGT (red) were observed. Co-localization of H. pylori and GGT is shown in Fig. 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Double-immunofluorescence staining was performed to assess the expression of H. pylori GGT in H. pylori-positive stomach biopsy specimens. Using the H. pylori-positive antral biopsy specimens, H. pylori fluorescence (green fluorescence) and GGT (red) were detected. Co-localization between portions of H. pylori and GGT is shown using arrow heads.

Correlation between H. pylori infection status via the ex vivo gGlu-HMRG imaging assay and Kyoto classification of gastritis

H. pylori infection and chronic gastritis are reportedly closely associated, and the Kyoto classification of gastritis is used to diagnose H. pylori infection from endoscopic findings3. The association between the results of the gGlu-HMRG assay and endoscopic findings in accordance with the Kyoto classification of gastritis were assessed via univariate and multivariate analyses. On univariate analysis, the H. pylori infection status assessed through fluorescence exhibited significant correlations with H. pylori infection status and atrophy, while the H. pylori infection status assessed via the gGlu-HMRG imaging analysis correlated significantly only with H. pylori infection status assessed via multivariate analysis (Table 1, the antrum). Furthermore, the H. pylori infection status assessed via gGlu-HMRG, using stomach body specimens, exhibited significant correlations with the H. pylori infection status, atrophy, and diffuse redness upon univariate analysis. H. pylori infection status assessed via gGlu-HMRG imaging analysis and that assessed via multivariate analysis displayed a significant correlation (Table 2, the stomach body). Furthermore, upon ex vivo gGlu-HMRG imaging, significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed in the extent of atrophic gastritis per the thresholds in both antral and the stomach body (Supplemental Information).

Table 1.

Association between the results of the ex vivo gGlu-HMRG assay in the antrum and endoscopic findings of the Kyoto classification of gastritis.

Factor Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR* 95%CI** P OR* 95%CI** P
H. pylori infection status 15.00 3.20 ~ 70.39 0.0006 8.00 1.16 ~ 55.26 0.0349
Atrophy 11.00 2.37 ~ 51.14 0.0022 2.75 0.38 ~ 19.67 0.3136
Intestinal metaplasia 2.06 0.45 ~ 9.42 0.3519
Diffuse redness 8.00 1.50–42.65 0.0149 1.67 0.20–14.03 0.6376
Hypertrophy of gastric fold 1.75 0.43 ~ 7.08 0.4328
Nodularity
Foveolar-hyperplastic polyp
Xanthoma 0.70 0.15 ~ 3.28 0.6509
Sticky mucus 8.50 0.95 ~ 75.80 0.0552
Regular arrangement of collecting venules 0.33 0.08 ~ 1.27 0.1077
Fundic gland polyp
Red streak

*Odds ratio.

**Confidence interval.

Table 2.

Association between the results of the ex vivo gGlu-HMRG assay in the stomach body and endoscopic findings of the Kyoto classification of gastritis.

Factor Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR* 95%CI** P OR* 95%CI** P
H. pylori infection status 40.38 6.55 ~ 248.98 <0.0001 24.54 2.53 ~ 238.19 0.0058
Atrophy 14.44 3.06 ~ 68.18 0.0007 1.08 0.09 ~ 13.54 0.9505
Intestinal metaplasia 4.53 0.83 ~ 24.76 0.081
Diffuse redness 4.89 1.11 ~ 21.47 0.0356 2.54 0.22 ~ 29.24 0.4541
Hypertrophy of gastric fold 2.00 0.49 ~ 8.09 0.331
Nodularity
Foveolar-hyperplastic polyp
Xanthoma 0.79 0.17 ~ 3.69 0.7639
Sticky mucus 1.88 0.40 ~ 8.82 0.4223
Regular arrangement of collecting venules 0.14 0.03 ~ 0.61 0.0094 1.14 0.11 ~ 11.74 0.9109
Fundic gland polyp 2.59 0.22 ~ 30.98 0.4528
Red streak

*Odds ratio.

**Confidence interval.

Discussion

The present in vitro study revealed that fluorescence was emitted with its activatable probe in the presence of the wild-type H. pylori strain, while no fluorescence was observed in the ggt-gene disrupted mutant. Furthermore, fluorescence emission was inhibited by the GGT-specific inhibitor. Co-localization between H. pylori GGT and H. pylori cells was observed in the stomach biopsy specimens. Together, these H. pylori strains produced GGT that activated gGlu-HMRG, yielding sufficient fluorescence emission via its enzymatic product, HMRG.

The present ex vivo imaging analysis of gGlu-HMRG revealed that a significant increase in FIVs among H. pylori-positive rather than -negative stomach biopsy specimens, indicating that gGlu-HMRG is applicable in diagnosing H. pylori infections. Furthermore, FIV differed significantly between the H. pylori-eradicated and H. pylori-positive biopsy specimens. Such pilot results suggest that gGlu-HMRG may even be useful to assess H. pylori eradication; however, these findings warrant further verification via larger prospective studies.

This optical fluorescence imaging method offers advantages including portability of equipment and ease of use. In the present ex vivo imaging assay, stomach biopsy specimens were directly treated with gGlu-HMRG, and substantial fluorescence was obtained after 5 min and more distinctly after 15 min. Current diagnostic methods for H. pylori infection include the rapid urease test, the 13C-urea breath test, anti-H. pylori antibody tests in body fluids, and the fecal bacterial antigen test. The most rapid diagnostic method among these diagnostic methods is still the breath analysis based on H. pylori-specific urease activity, yielding the H. pylori status in approximately 20 min in-house16 or in several days owing to outsourcing of the assay in actual clinical practice, even at our university hospital. However, the fluorescent method shown in the present workflow could provide results at no more than 15 min. Even at 5 min, significant differences were observed in defined FI values between H. pylori-positive and -negative specimens. At present, the diagnostic performance for H. pylori infections via ex vivo imaging assays of gGlu-HMRG was not superior to of other previously established diagnostic methods16,17. However, this fluorescence-based method may yield results more rapidly via further improvements in the assay system and methodology.

Extracellular GGT in the SHIN3 ovarian cancer cell line is potentially eliminated via rinsing with PBS when handling surgical specimens18. However, it is unclear whether GGT H. pylori is present on the cell membrane or secreted. The present results suggest that GGT is secreted into the stomach and potentially eliminated via rinsing of biopsy samples with PBS. In our in vitro experiment, fluorescence was observed with gGlu-HMRG in the supernatant fractions (Fig. 2), being potentially extracellular owing to secretion at least in part. Furthermore, H. pylori predominantly colonizes the gastric mucosa19, and mucus containing secreted GGT might be similarly lost during the preparation step prior to this ex vivo activatable probe assay. Thus, the decrease and re-localization of secreted GGT via PBS washing can affect the diagnostic performance of current ex vivo imaging analyses. Nevertheless, in the present study, it was necessary to rinse clinical samples obtained from an acidic environment in the stomach to neutralize pH with PBS, since gGlu-HMRG emits strong fluorescence, especially under acidic conditions. Handling of samples prior to ex vivo imaging with the activatable probe gGlu-HMRG remains unresolved and beyond the scope of this study. Thus, further studies are required to validate the actual performance of methods of diagnosing H. pylori infections with improvements in not only assay system but also preparation methodology in handling gastric samples for more accurate clinical application.

A group of gastric non-H. pylori Helicobacter species including H. heilmannii, with potential for zoonosis, are reportedly associated with mucosa-associated lymphoma in humans20. Urease tests are reportedly insensitive in species-level identification. Again, Pérez-Pérez et al. reported that urease-negative variants developed spontaneously; the frequency approached 10−5 from the wild-type strains of H. pylori21. A previous Japanese survey of patients with chronic active gastritis or peptic ulcers revealed 7 urease-negative H. pylori among the 1602 isolates22. Moreover, the clinically obtained urease-negative strain continued to exist for at least 42 weeks in the stomach of Mongolian gerbils, inducing gastric ulcers22. These data suggest that urease in H. pylori would not always necessarily contribute to virulence even in certain settings of such significant gastrointestinal diseases. Other diagnostic methods independent of bacterial urease activity, including the present optical fluorescence imaging assay, need to be established.

We did not perform additive sampling to investigate the association between the results of ex vivo gGlu-HMRG imaging and histological findings beyond the methodological protocol of the current imaging study. Sampling errors may occur during diagnosis, using biopsy-based methods of H. pylori infection such as the rapid urease test, despite obtaining biopsy specimens from both the antrum and stomach body. As intestinal metaplasia or atrophy may deter accurate diagnosis, we evaluated the association between H. pylori status assessed via the ex vivo gGlu-HMRG imaging assay and endoscopic findings based on the Kyoto classification of gastritis, including atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. The Kyoto classification of gastritis considers the previously established association between endoscopic findings and H. pylori infection status. In the classification, characteristic endoscopic findings in H. pylori-negative individuals are ascertained from regular sampling of collecting venules, fundic gland polyps, red streaks, and hematin, while findings such as atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, diffuse redness, enlarged fold, nodularity, xanthoma, foveolar-hyperplastic polyp, and sticky mucus were observed among individuals with H. pylori infections3. Nevertheless, the presence of an H. pylori infection assessed via the gGlu-HMRG ex vivo assay exhibited a significant correlation only with the H. pylori infection status. Topical application of gGlu-HMRG was useful for on-site or intraoperative identification of various cancer tissues12,13,15,18,23,24. Upon direct treatment of the gastric surface with gGlu-HMRG directly during endoscopic examination, it is possible to visualize H. pylori GGT during on-going endoscopy through fluorescence emission, independent of endoscopic findings. Further prospective studies are required to resolve sampling issues to elucidate the relationship between ex vivo gGlu-HMRG imaging assay and histological findings using the updated Sydney system.

Conclusions

The gGlu-HMRG assay substantially elucidated H. pylori GGT activity in vitro. The ex vivo H. pylori GGT-activatable fluorescence assay is potentially applicable for rapid diagnosis of H. pylori infections. Further larger well-designed studies are required to validate diagnostic performance with improvements in the assay system and methodology.

Declarations

The university ethics committees approved the study (#15012681). Ethics approval and consent to participate: Informed consent were obtained enrolled patients in this study. Consent for publication was obtained from all authors. Availability of data and material: All authors agreed to the journal guidelines.

Supplementary information

Supplemental information (410.7KB, pdf)

Author Contributions

T.A., acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript; H.I., analysis and interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript; K.M., acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; M.K., acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data; T.K., acquisition of data; M.N., acquisition of data; T.O., analysis and interpretation of data; M.F., analysis and interpretation of data; J.A., acquisition of data; Y.A., acquisition of data; K.O., acquisition of data; F.T., analysis and interpretation of data; K.N., conception and design; Y.U., conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Hajime Isomoto, Email: hajimei2002@yahoo.co.jp.

Yasuteru Urano, Email: uranokun@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-45768-x.

References

  • 1.Kunutsor SK. Gamma-glutamyltransferase-friend or foe within? Liver. Int. 2016;36:1723–1734. doi: 10.1111/liv.13221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pompella A, De Tata V, Paolicchi A, Zunino F. Expression of gamma-glutamyltransferase in cancer cells and its significance in drug resistance. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006;71:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sugano K, et al. Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Gut. 2015;64:1353–1367. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shibayama K, et al. A novel apoptosis-inducing protein from Helicobacter pylori. Mol. Microbiol. 2003;47:443–451. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ricci V, Giannouli M, Romano M, Zarrilli R. Helicobacter pylori gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and its pathogenic role. World. J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:630–638. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i3.630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim KM, et al. Gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase of Helicobacter pylori induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in AGS cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;355:562–567. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gerhard M, et al. A secreted low-molecular-weight protein from Helicobacter pylori induces cell-cycle arrest of T cells. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1327–1339. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schmees C, et al. Inhibition of T-cell proliferation by Helicobacter pylori gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1820–1833. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Beigier-Bompadre M, et al. Modulation of the CD4+ T-cell response by Helicobacter pylori depends on known virulence factors and bacterial cholesterol and cholesterol α-glucoside content. J. Infect. Dis. 2011;204:1339–1348. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oertli M, et al. Helicobacter pylori γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and vacuolating cytotoxin promote gastric persistence and immune tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:3047–3052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211248110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gong M, Ling SS, Lui SY, Yeoh KG, Ho B. Helicobacter pylori gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase is a pathogenic factor in the development of peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:564–573. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Urano Y, et al. Rapid cancer detection by topically spraying a γ-glutamyltranspeptidase-activated fluorescent probe. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011;3:110–119. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miyata Y, et al. Intraoperative imaging of hepatic cancers using γ-glutamyltranspeptidase-specific fluorophore enabling real-time identification and estimation of recurrence. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:3542. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03760-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shinden Y, et al. Rapid diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using a new fluorescent method with γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:27525. doi: 10.1038/srep27525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ueo H, et al. Rapid intraoperative visualization of breast lesions with γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12080. doi: 10.1038/srep12080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Urita Y, et al. Breath sample collection through the nostril reduces false-positive results of 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Dig. Liver. Dis. 2004;36:661–665. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2004.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang YK, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current options and developments. World. J. Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11221–11235. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harada T, et al. Surgical tissue handling methods to optimize ex vivo fluorescence with the activatable optical probe γ-glutamyl hydroxymethyl rhodamine green. Contrast. Media. Mol. Imaging. 2016;11:572–578. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hidaka E, et al. Helicobacter pylori and two ultrastructurally distinct layers of gastric mucous cell mucins in the surface mucous gel layer. Gut. 2001;49:474–480. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.4.474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bento-Miranda M, Figueiredo C. Helicobacter heilmannii sensu lato: an overview of the infection in humans. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:17779–17787. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pérez-Pérez GI, Olivares AZ, Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Characterization of Helicobacter pylori variants selected for urease deficiency. Infect. Immun. 1992;60:3658–3663. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.9.3658-3663.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mine T, Muraoka H, Saika T, Kobayashi I. Characteristics of a clinical isolate of urease-negative Helicobacter pylori and its ability to induce gastric ulcers in Mongolian gerbils. Helicobacter. 2005;10:125–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2005.00300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mizushima T, et al. Fluorescent imaging of superficial head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using a γ-glutamyltranspeptidase-activated targeting agent: a pilot study. BMC. Cancer. 2016;16:411. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2421-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hino H, et al. Rapid cancer fluorescence imaging using a γ-glutamyltranspepetidase-specific probe for primary lung cancer. Transl. Oncol. 2016;9:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental information (410.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES