Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 25;10:1412. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01412

Table 3.

Two-intercept models on language use.

Model 1: Entropy Model 2: Frequency of nouns Model 3: Clauses per sentence



Parameter Est. 95% CI Exp.(Est.)(100%) 95% CI Est. 95% CI
Fixed effects
Intercept
Patient 6.00∗∗∗ [5.93, 6.08] 128.16∗∗∗ [119.41, 137.41] 1.21∗∗∗ [1.16, 1.27]
Partner 6.04∗∗∗ [5.98, 6.10] 124.77∗∗∗ [115.38, 134.80] 1.18∗∗∗ [1.13, 1.22]
Age
Patient 0.00 [0.00, 0.01] 1.00 [1.00, 1.01] 0.00 [0.00, 0.00]
Partner 0.00 [0.00, 0.01] 1.00 [1.00, 1.01] 0.00 [0.00, 0.00]
WP Interlocutors:
Child(ren)
Patient -0.26 [-0.47, -0.06] 0.95 [0.69, 1.32] -0.19∗∗∗ [-0.29, -0.09]
Partner -0.01 [-0.22, 0.19] 0.76 [0.55, 1.04] -0.05 [-0.14, 0.05]
Family member(s)
Patient 0.07 [-0.18, 0.31] 0.97 [0.65, 1.43] -0.11 [-0.23, 0.01]
Partner -0.06 [-0.37, 0.24] 0.91 [0.56, 1.49] -0.02 [-0.17, 0.12]
Friend(s)
Patient -0.24∗∗ [-0.39, -0.10] 1.04 [0.83, 1.31] -0.06 [-0.13, 0.01]
Partner 0.04 [-0.12, 0.20] 1.02 [0.80, 1.30] -0.07 [-0.15, 0.00]
Stranger(s)
Patient -0.38 [-0.77, 0.01] 0.91 [0.49, 1.68] -0.23 [-0.42, -0.05]
Partner -0.21 [-0.55, 0.13] 0.66 [0.39, 1.12] -0.06 [-0.22, 0.10]
Multiparty
Patient -0.05 [-0.16, 0.06] 1.10 [0.93, 1.31] -0.10∗∗∗ [-0.15, -0.05]
Partner -0.03 [-0.15, 0.09] 0.90 [0.74, 1.09] -0.09∗∗∗ [-0.15, -0.04]
Control variables
Education
Patient -0.01 [-0.02, 0.01]
Partner 0.02∗∗ [0.01, 0.04]
W.C. per 50 s
Patient 0.01∗∗∗ [0.01, 0.01] 1.01∗∗∗ [1.01, 1.02] 0.01∗∗∗ [0.01, 0.01]
Partner 0.02∗∗∗ [0.01, 0.02] 1.02∗∗∗ [1.01, 1.02] 0.01∗∗∗ [0.01, 0.01]
Random effects
Intercept (SD)
Patient 0.09 0.10 0.19
Partner 0.10 0.13 0.15
Residual (SD) 0.45 1.61 0.53
Pseudo R-squared 21.27% 19.47% 27.61%
-2log likelihood 18248.1 18564.53 9576.322

Est., Estimated result; Exp.(), Exponential results; CI, Confidence interval; WP, Within-person effects; Multiparty, Multiparty conversations; Education, Years of education; and W.C. per 50 s, Word count per 50 s. p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.