Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 8;17:689–698. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.05.006

Table 1.

Comparison of different engineered nuclease platforms.

ZFNs TALENs Cas9 Meganuclease
Recognition location Typically 9–18 bp per monomer, 18–36 bp per pair Typically 14–20 bp per monomer, 28–40 bp per pair Typically 20 bp guide sequence + PAM sequence Between 14 and 40 bp
Targeting restrictions Difficult for non-G-rich sites 5′ targeted base must be a T Targeted site should precede a PAM sequence Typically low efficiency for targeting novel sites
Specificity Tolerating few positional mismatches Tolerating few positional mismatches Tolerating positional and multiple consecutive mismatches Tolerating few positional mismatches
Difficulties of engineering Requiring substantial protein engineering Requiring complex molecular cloning methods Using easy cloning methods and oligo synthesis Requiring substantial protein engineering
Difficulties of in vivo delivery Relatively easy as small size of expression elements suitable for varieties of viral vectors Difficult due to the large size of functional components Commonly used SpCas9 with large size may cause packaging problems for viral vectors such as AAV Relatively easy as small size of expression elements suitable for varieties of viral vectors
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure