Table 3.
β coef. | SE | P-value | LCL | UCL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recipient:donor BSA mismatch | 10.2 | 5.12 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 20.2 |
Recipient BSA | 5.0 | 2.58 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 10.1 |
Donor BSA | −5.7 | 2.63 | 0.03 | −10.85 | −0.52 |
Initial hypothesis-driven multivariable model was adjusted for donor age, type of kidney (living versus cadaveric), cold ischemia time, donor BSA, recipient BSA and the RD BSA mismatch ratio (as a measure of the workload). In the next steps, nonsignificant variables were removed one at a time, leaving only the significant variables in the mode (backward selection) [38].
Based on β coefficients, a 0.1 kg/m2 increase in the donor BSA was associated with a 33% lower UPodCR. In contrast, a 0.1 kg/m2 increase in recipient BSA was associated with a 1.4-fold increase in average UPodCR. Similarly, a 0.1 increase in the recipient:donor BSA mismatch ratio was associated with a 2.0. Could write out just as 2-fold increase in UPodCR. Thus, for example, if the recipient BSA was 20% larger than the donor BSA, then one would expect an almost 4-fold increased UPodCR compared with a donor and recipient pair with a similar BSA.
BSA, body surface area (DuBois equation); Coef., coefficient (see text); SE, standard error; LCL, lower confidence limit; UCL, upper confidence limit.