Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 2;10(14):3172–3178. doi: 10.7150/jca.30257

Table 2.

Prognostic factors associated with DFS and OS as determined by univariate and multivariate analysis

DFS OS
Variables HR(95%CI) p-value Variables HR(95%CI) p-value
Univariate analysis Univariate analysis
DLL 4 negative vs. positive 1.93(1.27-2.95) 0.002 DLL 4 negative vs. positive 1.95(1.24-3.08) 0.004
*Histological differentiation 1.72(1.10-2.67) 0.016 *Histological differentiation 1.83(1.12-2.99) 0.015
Borrman (1,2 vs 3,4) 1.85(1.33-2.56) <0.001 Borrman (1,2 vs 3,4) 2.16(1.52-3.08) <0.001
Lauren intestinal vs. diffuse 1.53(1.10-2.14) 0.012 Lauren intestinal vs. diffuse 1.70(1.08-2.68) 0.019
pT 1,2 vs. pT 3,4 2.26(1.54-3.30) <0.001 pT 1,2 vs. pT 3,4 2.46(1.62-3.73) <0.001
pN 0,1 vs. pN 2,3 2.73(1.87-4.00) <0.001 pN 0,1 vs. pN 2,3 2.57(1.69-3.90) <0.001
Stage(II/IIIa versus IIIb/IV) 3.82(2.58-5.65) <0.001 Stage(II/IIIa versus IIIb/IV) 3.55(2.31-4.56) <0.001
Surgical resection TG vs STG 1.70(1.16-2.47) 0.007 Surgical resection TG vs STG 1.84(1.22-2.80) 0.004
Multivariate analysis Multivariate analysis
DLL 4 negative vs. positive 1.80(1.14-2.86) 0.012 DLL 4 negative vs. positive 2.07(1.23-3.46) 0.006
*Histological differentiation 1.78(1.10-2.89) 0.021 Lauren intestinal vs. diffuse 2.19(1.30-3.69) 0.003
Stage(II/IIIa versus IIIb/IV) 3.95(2.56-6.11) <0.001 Stage(II/IIIa versus IIIb/IV) 3.93(2.45-6.32) <0.001