Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 2;10(15):3315–3322. doi: 10.7150/jca.29667

Table 4.

Comparison with other studies

Institute Year No. disease treatment TD, GyE Follow-up, months LC OS
HIT 28 2015 56 chordoma C or C+PH 66 (60-74) 25 (range: NA) 2y: 76%
3 y: 53%
2 y: 100%
3 y: 100%
NIRS 9 2017 73 ChSa C 70.4 (64-73.6) 49.4 (6.4-146.4) 5 y: 53% 5 y: 53%
NIRS 29 2016 188 Chordoma C 67.2 (64-73.6) 62 (6.8-147.5) 1 y: 99%
5 y: 77%
1 y: NA
5 y: 81%
HIBMC 7 2014 23 chordoma C or P 70.4 38 (7-78) 3 y: 94% 3 y: 83%
MGH 30 2015 126 chordoma P 72.4 (46.3-83.6) 41 (range: NA) 5 y: 62% 5 y: 81%
MC 31 2005 52 chordoma Surgery NA 93.6 (25.2-276) 5 y: 59% 5 y: 74%
IOR/INT 32 2010 130 Chordoma Surgery NA 142 (76-210) 5 y: 52% 5 y: 78%
Present 2018 21 ChSa /chordoma C 69 (57-80) 21.8 (7.2-39.2) 1 y: 93.8%
2 y: 85.2%
1 y: 100%
2 y: 100%

ChSa: chondrosarcoma; C: carbon ion radiotherapy; P: proton radiotherapy; PH: photon radiotherapy; TD: total dose; GyE: gray equivalents; LC: local control; OS: overall survival; HIT: Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center; NIRS: National Institute of Radiological Sciences; HIBMC: Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center; MGH: Massachusetts General Hospital; MC: Mayo Clinic; IOR: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli; INT: Istituto Nazionale Tumori.