Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 2;10(15):3315–3322. doi: 10.7150/jca.29667

Table 5.

Predictive factors investigated in other studies

Institute No. Treatment Factors been evaluated
HIT 39 101 primary, n=88
recurrent, n=13
age, sex, tumor volume, treatment (primary, recurrence)
HIT 28 56 primary, n=41
recurrent, n=15
age, dose, resection status, sexa, tumor volume, tumor location, treatment (primary, recurrence)a
NIRS 9 73 primary, n=55
recurrent, n=17
Metastatic, n=3
age, histologya, tumor volumea, tumor location, treatment (primary, recurrence, metastasis)
NIRS 29 188 primary, n=188 dose, level of proximal invasion, sex, tumor volume
GSI 35 79 primary, n=54
recurrent, n=25
agea, boost volumea, dose, sex, tumor grade, treatment (primary, recurrence)
GSI 34 155 primary, n= 101
recurrent, n=54
agea, boost volumea, dose, sex, treatment (primary, recurrence) a
HIBMC 7 23 primary, n=23 age, dose fractionation, ECOG PS, ion type, sexa, spacer placement, tumor volume
PSI 36 222 primary, n=171
recurrent, n=51
age, compression of the brainstem or optic apparatusa, histologya, number of weekly fractions, sex, GTVa,
treatment (primary, recurrence)
Present study 21 primary, n=8
recurrent, n=13
age, metal implantation, sex, treatment (primary, recurrence), dose, tumor volume

a: factors significantly correlated with LC, PFS, or OS (p ≤0.05). HIT: Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center; NIRS: National Institute of Radiological Sciences; GSI: Society for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt; HIBMC: Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center; PSI: Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute; GTV: gross tumor volume.