Table 4.

Comparative analysis—HEHO and dynsTGA vs. other metaheuristics for unconstrained benchmarks. (best results for each performance indicator are marked bold).

ID	Indicator	IBPA	LADA	TS	WSA	HEHO	dynsTGA
	Best	0.00815	0.00088	0.14185	0.888 × 10−15	0.00	0.00
F1	Mean	0.02260	0.00473	0.38528	0.888 × 10−15	0.00	0.00
	StdDev	0.01021	0.00157	0.07488	1.0029 × 10−31	0.00	0.00
	Best	−0.35238	−0.35238	−0.35238	−0.35238	−0.35239	−0.35239
F2	Mean	−0.35238	−0.35238	−0.35238	−0.35236	−0.35239	−0.35239
	StdDev	1.067 × 10−6	5.576 × 10−7	2.183 × 10−5	8.761 × 10−6	2.28 × 10−8	3.53 × 10−9
	Best	3.217 × 10−9	1.259 × 10−9	3.955 × 10−7	5.589 × 10−8	0.00	0.00
F3	Mean	2.826 × 10−7	2.486 × 10−7	7.637 × 10−6	1.267 × 10−7	5.44 × 10−8	2.04 × 10−9
	StdDev	2.838 × 10−7	2.704 × 10−7	6.302 × 10−6	3.877 × 10−8	6.01 × 10−9	5.11 × 10−10
	Best	−0.99999	−0.99999	−0.99999	−0.99999	−0.99999	−0.99999
F4	Mean	−0.83334	−0.99999	−0.46667	−0.99957	−0.99999	−0.99999
	StdDev	0.379010	2.885 × 10−6	0.507330	2.025 × 10−4	1.22 × 10−5	8.45 × 10−5
	Best	0.08790	0.00606	4.58753	0.00	0.00	0.00
F5	Mean	0.29275	0.01584	6.35541	0.00	0.00	0.00
	StdDev	0.12481	0.00554	0.89405	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Best	1.6578	13.1161	24.7395	8.9167	0.5395	0.5361
F6	Mean	12.1420	26.4740	66.1024	8.9449	0.8876	0.8502
	StdDev	14.9202	14.9521	19.1763	0.0160	0.3053	0.3137
	Best	3.00000	3.00000	3.00000	3.00000	3.00000	3.00000
F7	Mean	5.70001	10.00710	3.00053	3.00032	3.00083	3.00068
	StdDev	8.23847	16.46670	5.751 × 10−4	1.622 × 10−4	6.211 × 10−4	7.305 × 10−4
	Best	5.399 × 10−6	8.124 × 10−5	3.120 × 10−5	32.83	2.05 × 10−6	8.45 × 10−6
F8	Mean	0.00157	5.362 × 10−4	2.047 × 10−4	32.83	4.64 × 10−2	3.50 × 10−2
	StdDev	0.00162	3.456 × 10−4	1.382 × 10−4	1.445 × 10−15	1.92 × 10−1	1.72 × 10−1