Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 1;19(11):2515. doi: 10.3390/s19112515

Table 5.

Simulation results for M=40, N=8 and the search domain area 100U×100U with different values for Pn averaged in 30 runs—comparative analysis between EHO, HEHO, TGA, and dynsTGA (best results for each performance indicator are marked bold).

Algorithms Pn=5 Pn=2
Mean NNL Mean EL Computing Time (s) Mean NNL Mean EL Computing Time (s)
EHO 6.8 0.79 1.1 6.2 0.71 0.9
HEHO 5.3 0.45 1.2 5.1 0.37 1.0
TGA 5.5 0.42 0.9 5.0 0.36 0.8
dynsTGA 4.5 0.19 1.2 4.3 0.16 1.1