Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;29(Suppl 2):427–434. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S2.427

Table 4. Logistic regression analysisa: Annual mammography adherenceb.

Sample including a cancer history for self Sample excluding cancer history for self
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Predisposing factor
Age .95 (.89 – 1.01) .95 (.89 – 1.02)
Marital status (married or partnered) (Ref: never married or other) .44 (.17 – 1.12) .43 (.15 – 1.18)
Need factor
Self cancer history 3.27d (1.29 – 8.33) - -
Family cancer history 1.61 (.72 – 3.60) 1.50 (.63 – 3.56)
Self-rated health status (Ref: very bad / bad)
Moderate 1.56 (.38 – 6.48) 1.50 (.29 – 7.61)
Very good / good 1.76 (.39 – 7.96) 1.62 (.30 – 8.68)
Enabling factor
Education (bachelor’s degree) (Ref: <bachelor’s degree) .65 (.23 – 1.89) .42 (.13 – 1.34)
Income (Ref: < $20,000)
$20,000 - $39,999 2.12 (.57 – 7.80) 1.45 (.36 – 5.85)
$40,000 - $59,999 .35 (.07 – 1.67) .34 (.06 – 1.81)
$60,000 - $79,999 .54 (.15 – 1.95) .34 (.07 – 1.51)
$80,000 - $99,999 1.21 (.21 – 6.81) 1.13 (.19 – 6.71)
≥$100,000 .54 (.10 – 2.94) .65 (.12 – 3.60)
Annual health check-up (Ref=no) .17e (.06 – 0.49) .19e (.06 – 0.56)
Health insurance (Ref=no) .83 (.29 – 2.41) .71 (.22 – 2.31)
Doctor recommendation .92 (.35 – 2.41) 1.07 (.38 – 2.96)
English level (Ref: very poor/poor)
Moderate .93 (.32 – 2.69) 1.30 (.39 – 4.29)
Very good / good 1.17 (.26 – 5.14) 2.21 (.45 – 10.76)
BC knowledge scorec 1.24 (.77 – 1.97) 1.12 (.70 – 1.78)
BC self-efficacy scorec 2.06e (1.24 – 3.41) 1.83d (1.04 – 3.20)
BC decisional balance scorec 3.08f (1.86 – 5.10) 3.43f (1.91 – 6.17)
Number of observations 185 215
Wald x2 test 40.74e 50.02f
Pseudo R2 .3371 .3690

a. Heterogeneity robust standard errors are used

b. Mammography adherence based on annual screening mammography

c. Standardized scores

d. P<.05.

e. P<.01

f. P<.001.