Table 3.
Total Abstinence | Alcohol Abstinence | Drug Abstinence | Arrested | Employed | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aOR | SE | p | aOR | SE | p | aOR | SE | p | aOR | SE | p | aOR | SE | p | |
Organizational Characteristics | |||||||||||||||
Part of a Larger Organization | 3.98 | 1.46 | 0.000† | 3.04 | 1.22 | 0.006 | 3.19 | 1.02 | 0.000† | 0.59 | 0.19 | 0.109 | 1.11 | 0.43 | 0.790 |
Affiliated with a Treatment Program | 2.56 | 1.20 | 0.045 | 1.98 | 0.94 | 0.149 | 1.83 | 0.78 | 0.151 | 0.87 | 0.30 | 0.675 | 2.92 | 1.06 | 0.003† |
Referral agreement with Parole/Probation | 1.52 | 0.62 | 0.304 | 1.13 | 0.51 | 0.786 | 1.62 | 0.58 | 0.180 | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.025 | 2.43 | 0.78 | 0.006 |
Manager Lives Onsite* | 0.94 | 0.57 | 0.913 | 1.21 | 0.78 | 0.770 | 0.63 | 0.34 | 0.387 | 1.85 | 0.77 | 0.142 | 1.70 | 0.86 | 0.297 |
Capacity (Number of beds; 7–50) | |||||||||||||||
0–10 (reference) | |||||||||||||||
11–20 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.469 | 0.76 | 0.50 | 0.677 | 0.64 | 0.37 | 0.441 | 0.56 | 0.25 | 0.193 | 0.60 | 0.31 | 0.329 |
21 or more | 0.50 | 0.32 | 0.275 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.236 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.695 | 0.89 | 0.39 | 0.796 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.039 |
Wald Test of Capacity | 0.547 | 0.388 | 0.716 | 0.253 | 0.086 | ||||||||||
Residence & Operational Characteristics | |||||||||||||||
SLN Chapter | |||||||||||||||
LA Metro (Reference) | |||||||||||||||
San Fernando Valley/San Gabriel Valley | 1.55 | 1.05 | 0.521 | 4.39 | 2.39 | 0.006† | 2.23 | 1.33 | 0.182 | 0.84 | 0.42 | 0.722 | 1.95 | 1.05 | 0.213 |
South Bay Long Beach | 1.10 | 0.57 | 0.858 | 1.09 | 0.43 | 0.829 | 0.93 | 0.43 | 0.871 | 0.80 | 0.33 | 0.579 | 1.89 | 0.80 | 0.133 |
West LA | 2.26 | 1.50 | 0.221 | 8.54 | 5.04 | 0.000† | 1.60 | 0.97 | 0.434 | 1.08 | 0.55 | 0.883 | 5.04 | 2.75 | 0.003 |
Wald Test of SLN Chapter | 0.585 | 0.000† | 0.359 | 0.878 | 0.032† | ||||||||||
Monthly Fees of $600 or More | 2.63 | 1.49 | 0.088 | 3.18 | 1.76 | 0.036 | 2.65 | 1.34 | 0.053 | 2.09 | 0.82 | 0.063 | 1.96 | 0.95 | 0.165 |
Meals Provided* | 1.76 | 0.73 | 0.171 | 1.84 | 0.78 | 0.151 | 1.74 | 0.66 | 0.147 | 1.10 | 0.33 | 0.739 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 0.415 |
House Gender | |||||||||||||||
Co-ed (Reference) | |||||||||||||||
Women | 1.83 | 1.29 | 0.395 | 1.67 | 1.20 | 0.480 | 1.87 | 1.21 | 0.333 | 1.72 | 0.94 | 0.325 | 2.54 | 1.58 | 0.134 |
Men | 2.34 | 1.19 | 0.095 | 2.90 | 1.42 | 0.031 | 2.05 | 0.94 | 0.114 | 1.33 | 0.49 | 0.440 | 1.44 | 0.62 | 0.392 |
Wald Test of Gender | 0.219 | 0.090 | 0.231 | 0.525 | 0.278 | ||||||||||
15%+ of Residents on Parole/Probation* | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.002 | 0.49 | 0.26 | 0.177 | 0.46 | 0.18 | 0.044 | 1.71 | 0.57 | 0.108 | 1.11 | 0.46 | 0.809 |
30+ Required Days Sober* | 1.47 | 0.72 | 0.432 | 0.93 | 0.45 | 0.875 | 1.05 | 0.45 | 0.913 | 0.43 | 0.12 | 0.003† | 1.36 | 0.55 | 0.443 |
Drug Testing at Intake* | 1.00 | 0.60 | 0.997 | 2.23 | 1.37 | 0.192 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.992 | 0.92 | 0.35 | 0.837 | 2.52 | 1.20 | 0.052 |
Mandated AA/NA Attendance* | 2.74 | 1.40 | 0.048 | 3.59 | 1.86 | 0.014 | 2.41 | 1.10 | 0.055 | 2.11 | 0.78 | 0.042 | 1.39 | 0.63 | 0.460 |
Program Orientation | |||||||||||||||
SMPS Total Score ≥ 63* | 1.07 | 0.53 | 0.892 | 0.72 | 0.34 | 0.488 | 1.29 | 0.57 | 0.560 | 0.86 | 0.28 | 0.646 | 0.98 | 0.39 | 0.964 |
Quite a bit/Completely 12-step Oriented* | 2.95 | 1.50 | 0.034 | 2.67 | 1.32 | 0.047 | 2.09 | 0.94 | 0.102 | 0.54 | 0.17 | 0.052 | 2.31 | 0.96 | 0.043 |
Notes. Results from separate multilevel models testing the effect of various housing characteristics on substance use, criminal justice, and employment outcomes parameterize clustering of observations within participants and participants within houses (ICCs ranging from 0.008–0.137). All random intercept models control for time, condition, their interaction, gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, and number of days in the house. Individual ORs, SEs, and p-values are listed for each category of categorical variables as well as the p-value for Wald test of the overall effect of the categorical variable.
Denotes models with missing data on house characteristics that were subjected to sensitivity analyses employing different multiple imputation techniques. Findings in bold typeface reflect those that were robust across these different techniques.
Reflects findings that remained statistically significant in multivariable multilevel models.