Table 1.
ROI | x | y | z | No. of voxels in the cluster | D | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rFFA | 42 ± 0.6 | −49 ± 1.0 | −21 ± 0.6 | 253 ± 30 | 5.2 ± 0.6 | 23 |
lFFA | −40 ± 0.7 | −49 ± 1.3 | −21 ± 0.9 | 145 ± 34 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 21 |
rOFA | 41 ± 0.7 | −76 ± 1.6 | −15 ± 0.6 | 188 ± 31 | 5.9 ± 0.7 | 16 |
rLOC | 43 ± 1.0 | −78 ± 0.8 | 9 ± 0.9 | 167 ± 24 | 6.6 ± 0.7 | 18 |
lLOC | −41 ± 1.0 | −80 ± 0.8 | 7 ± 0.9 | 229 ± 24 | 5.8 ± 0.8 | 19 |
The MNI coordinates (x, y, z in millimeters) of the peak voxels from the IF > O and O < IF contrasts in the case of FFA, OFA, and LOC, respectively. ROIs were defined as the contiguous cluster of significantly activated voxels (t(560) > 2) within a 10 mm radius sphere centered at the given peaks. Please note, that for the correlation analysis the activity of a single voxel showing the largest beta difference in the IF versus NF contrast was chosen. The distance (D) of this voxel from the peak coordinate of each ROI is also shown in millimeters. Provided data are mean ± SEM across participants (N) for whom these regions were individually identifiable. Note that the OFA was reliably definable only in the right hemisphere in the majority of subjects.