. 2015 Jul 15;35(28):10371–10385. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0078-15.2015

Table 2.

Best-fitting parameter values and fit statistics averaged across participants

DSTP

μ_tar	μ_fl	a	c	Ter	μ_ss	μ_rs2			G²	BIC

0.128 (0.01)	0.080 (0.006)	0.149 (0.013)	0.136 (0.017)	216 (25)	0.362 (0.041)	0.915 (0.106)			79.4 (35)	130.3 (35)
SSP

p	sd_a	a	r_d	Ter					G²	BIC

0.356 (0.053)	2.59 (0.2)	0.117 (0.012)	0.063 (0.006)	259 (25)					83.2 (36)	119.6 (36)
DSTP-LCA

μ_tar	μ_fl	a	c	Ter	μ_ss	μ_rs2	k	w	G²	BIC

0.209 (0.02)	0.226 (0.047)	0.136 (0.011)	0.126 (0.009)	138 (27)	0.541 (0.041)	1.09 (0.29)	1.73 (0.97)	0.427 (0.322)	93.9 (44)	157.5 (40)
SSP-LCA

p	sd_a	a	r_d	Ter			k	w	G²	BIC

0.578 (0.083)	2.82 (0.412)	0.102 (0.013)	0.034 (0.005)	200 (17)			2.49 (1.38)	0.478 (0.629)	71.4 (35)	122.3 (35)

SDs across participants are shown in parentheses. μ_tar, Component rate for the target; μ_fl, component rate for the flankers; a, boundary separation for the response selection process; μ_ss, drift rate for the target identification process; c, boundary separation for the target identification process; μ_rs2, drift rate for response selection in phase 2; Ter, nondecision time; p, perceptual input; sd_a, spotlight width; r_d, spotlight shrinking rate; k, leakage; w, mutual inhibition.