Table 2.
Model parameter | Baseline |
tDCS − Baseline |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anodal | Cathodal | Sham | Anodal | Cathodal | Sham | |
β | 0.0846 ± 0.0318 | 0.0707 ± 0.0358 | 0.0808 ± 0.0403 | −0.0031 ± 0.0332 | 0.0115 ± 0.0267 | 0.0107 ± 0.0480 |
ϕ | 0.0304 ± 0.0349 | 0.0133 ± 0.0162 | 0.0700 ± 0.0770 | −0.0285 ± 0.0313 | −0.0018 ± 0.0114 | −0.0638 ± 0.0699 |
λ̂ | 0.9489 | 0.9537 | 0.9406 | −0.0073 | −0.0083 | −0.0127 |
θ̂ | 31.189 | 19.279 | 12.326 | −2.3406 | 1.9519 | 11.465 |
σ̂d | 0.0010 | 0.0028 | 0.0010 | 0.0025 | −0.0001 | 0.0053 |
aThe first three columns show the parameter estimates across all participants and trials within each stimulation group (anodal, cathodal, or sham) in the baseline condition. Columns 4 to 6 show the change in the parameter estimates under tDCS relative to baseline for each stimulation condition. Parameters β and ϕ were allowed to vary individually across participants and were fit in a hierarchical manner (see Materials and Methods). For these parameters, the table reports the means (± standard deviations) of the median values of each subject's posterior distribution. The remaining parameters were fit across the population; for these parameters, the table reports the medians of the population posterior distribution.