Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 28;35(43):14491–14500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1859-15.2015

Table 2.

Model fitsa

Model −LL BIC Pseudo-R2 α αP αN βtraining
Training
    Canonical 181.857 (31.188) 187.606 (32.174) 0.292 (0.050) 0.149 (0.026) 0.232 (0.040)
    Approach–avoidance 172.272 (29.544) 180.895 (31.023) 0.327 (0.056) 0.279 (0.048) 0.065 (0.011) 0.214 (0.037)
    Random choice 240.767 (22.860) 240.767 (22.860)
Testing βtest
    Canonical 74.0520 (3.9488) 76.4234 (3.9500) 0.0723 (0.0474) 0.911 (0.029)
    Approach–avoidance 69.8957 (3.7446) 72.2671 (3.7443) 0.1194 (0.0479) 0.878 (0.032)
    Random choice 240.767 (22.860) 240.767 (22.860)

aData are mean (SEM). LL, Log-likelihood; BIC, Bayes Information Criterion; α, learning rate for the Canonical model; αP and αN, learning rates for positive and negative outcomes, respectively, for the approach–avoidance model; βtraining and βtest, exploration–exploitation parameters for the training and test sessions, respectively.