Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 21;35(3):920–935. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2384-14.2015

Table 4.

Analyses of possible confounding variables (covariates) regarding their effects of sex, valence category, and the interaction between sex and valence category

Variable Interaction sex x-valence category Main effect of valence category Main effect of sex Positive pictures only: main effect of sex Neutral pictures only: main effect of sex Negative pictures only: main effect of sex
Picture valence rating reaction speed F(2,3442) = 19.97 F(2,3442) = 202.82 F(1,1720) = 5.71 t(1720) = −0.23 t(1720) = −1.65 t(1720) = −4.5
p = 2.4 × 10−9 p < 1 × 10−16 p = 0.017 p = 0.82 p = 0.099 p = 7.4 × 10−6
d = −0.01 d = −0.08 d = −0.23
Picture arousal rating reaction speed F(2,3366) = 59.99 F(2,3366) = 50.61 F(1,1682) = 5.89 t(1682) = −0.71 t(1682) = 0.39 t(1682) = −6.46
p < 1 × 10−16 p < 1 × 10−16 p = 0.015 p = 0.48 p = 0.7 p = 1.4 × 10−10
d = −0.04 d = 0.02 d = −0.33
Words SD F(2,3878) = 1.23 F(2,3878) = 83.7 F(1,1938) = 63.55 t(1938) = 6.51 t(1938) = 5.78 t(1938) = 4.76
p = 0.29 p < 1 × 10−16 p = 2.7 × 10−15 p = 9.5 × 10−11 p = 8.7 × 10−9 p = 2.1 × 10−6
d = 0.32 d = 0.28 d = 0.23

For reaction speed, there was a significant interaction between sex and valence category: males showed the slowest reaction times when viewing negative pictures (see Table 2). For the words short-delay (SD) memory there was a main effect of sex, with females in general outperforming males.