Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 25;35(8):3525–3536. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4390-14.2015

Table 1.

Statistical significance from Figure 7a

α1Zβ3γ2 Drug alone Drug + DA Wash Zβ3γ2 Drug alone Drug + DA Wash
BIC ****/†††† §§§§/†††† Not significant BIC ****/†††† §§§§/†† Not significant
GBZ ****/†††† §§§§/†††† Not significant GBZ ****/†††† §§§§/†††† Not significant
PTX ****/†††† Not significant/†††† ††† PTX **/†††† Not significant/†††† ††††

aSummary of statistical significance for GABAA antagonists modulating α1Zβ3γ2 (Fig. 7D) or Zβ3γ2 (Fig. 7H) receptors. Columns represent drug perfused alone (black bars from figure), drug applied with DA (hatched bars), or drug washoff with DA still present (white bars). Compounds were segregated by subtype and separately analyzed in one-way ANOVAs. Symbols show p values calculated within each ANOVA from Bonferroni's tests comparing data to baseline (*), DA (†), or drug alone (§; Fig. 7I). The correspondence between number of symbols and significance is as follows: 1, p ≤ 0.05; 2, p ≤ 0.01; 3, p ≤ 0.001; 4, p ≤ 0.0001.