Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 2;2019(7):CD011785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011785.pub2

Comparison 1. Prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 All cause mortality to near term age or discharge 1 53 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.42 [0.70, 8.38]
1.1 H2RA versus no treatment 1 53 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.42 [0.70, 8.38]
2 Any upper gastrointestinal bleeding in infants at risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding 4 329 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.22, 0.58]
2.1 H2RA versus no treatment 4 329 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.36 [0.22, 0.58]
3 Gastric lesions detected by endoscopy and macroscopically 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.28, 0.84]
3.1 H2RA versus no treatment 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.28, 0.84]
4 Serious adverse reactions 4 329 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4.1 H2RA versus no treatment 4 329 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]